Failures in Crisis Communication During the Covid-19 Pandemic in Slovenia: What Can We Learn From Audience Feedback?

Abstract

Abstract. During a pandemic, it is essential that most people respect the measures in place so as to keep the health crisis at bay. Still, a consensus must exist in society that the measures imposed by government are truly needed, just and legitimate, with several factors affecting whether this is achieved. In the article, we present the results of qualitative research (23 in-depth interviews) conducted in Slovenia at the peak of the first lockdown, focusing on how the study participants (women who were living alone during the first lockdown) perceived communication from the government and the public health authorities that comprised the official crisis communication group for managing the pandemic in Slovenia. The results present critical mistakes in communication that shaped trust in the official communicators and failed to motivate and encourage respondents to comply with the recommended and prescribed protective measures. Keywords: Covid-19, protective measures, risk communication, trust, fear appeal, solo-living women

A novel approach to conducting business research after COVID-19: incorporating crisis elements in the study frameworks

“…However, contrasted to the scenario-based model, the capacity-based model stresses developing abilities like financial backup plans, communication and preparation for remote work. They can still specify response plans for typical types of calamities like fires (Kamin and Perger, 2021). When responses are broken down into individual tasks, managers may better match and combine the needs of a crisis.…”

Quality of life in COVID-19 pandemic: A kaleidoscope of challenges and responses of various population groups during the crisis

“…A comprehensive crisis management plan was lacking, while individual actors' insufficient crisis management competencies led to specialised ad hoc structures being set up, overnight decisions being made and then suddenly reversed, and often to inconsistent and inappropriate communication with the public (Ferlin et al, 2021). Particularly critical mistakes were found in communication that shaped trust in the official communicators and failed to motivate and encourage individuals to comply with the recommended and prescribed protective measures (Kamin & Perger, 2021).…”