2015
DOI: 10.1093/jpids/piv024
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure to Validate a Multivariable Clinical Prediction Model to Identify Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Patients at High Risk for Candidemia

Abstract: We attempted to validate a previously derived clinical prediction rule for candidemia in the pediatric intensive care unit. This multicenter case control study did not identify significant association of candidemia with most of the previously identified predictors. Additional study in larger cohorts with other predictor variables is needed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…62 Unfortunately, this clinical prediction rule was not validated in a multicentre setting (5 medical centres in the US and 1 in Greece), where no significant association of candidemia was found with most of the previously identified predictors. 63 Small cohorts, substantial variation in antibiotic exposures in different units, and differences in the frequency of underlying oncologic diseases among critically ill case patients and controls were likely the reasons for this result. 64 Predicting candidemia in critically ill adults has also been problematic.…”
Section: Ris K Fac Tor S For De Velopment Of C Andidemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…62 Unfortunately, this clinical prediction rule was not validated in a multicentre setting (5 medical centres in the US and 1 in Greece), where no significant association of candidemia was found with most of the previously identified predictors. 63 Small cohorts, substantial variation in antibiotic exposures in different units, and differences in the frequency of underlying oncologic diseases among critically ill case patients and controls were likely the reasons for this result. 64 Predicting candidemia in critically ill adults has also been problematic.…”
Section: Ris K Fac Tor S For De Velopment Of C Andidemiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors developed a prediction model by combining the aforementioned factors (>10% risk) and observed a predicted probability of candidemia that ranged from 10.7% to 46% [ 73 ]. However, an attempt to validate the prediction model in a multicenter study proved unsuccessful [ 77 ]. A separate predictive IC probability model for PICU patients, the ERICAP scoring system, was developed by Jordan et al [ 5 ].…”
Section: Patients Admitted To a Picumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate this model, a prospective, multi-center case-control study was performed at six free standing pediatric institutions [ 18 ]. The study included 286 patients (96 cases and 190 controls).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%