2014
DOI: 10.22230/ijepl.2014v9n5a562
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure, The Next Generation: Why Rigorous Standards are not Sufficient to Improve Science Learning

Abstract: Although many states in the United States are adopting policies that require all students to complete college-preparatory science classes to graduate from high school, such policies have not always led to improved student outcomes. There is much speculation about the cause of the dismal results, but there is scant research on the processes by which the policies are being implemented at the school level, especially in schools that enroll large numbers of historically non-college-bound students. To address this … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Drawing upon Hitt and Tucker’s (2016) instructional leadership framework synthesis, we find that most discussions about leadership in content areas emphasize the leader’s responsibility for shepherding resources and creating conditions that facilitate teachers’ efforts to improve their instruction. These supports include providing a clear vision for mathematics and science instruction (Cobb & Jackson, 2011), establishing a robust mathematics and science curriculum (Casey, Dunlap, & Starrett, 2012b), offering professional development aligned to specific content areas (Bair & Bair, 2014; Fitzgerald & Schneider, 2013; Higgins & Bonne, 2012; Sebastian & Allensworth, 2012), and establishing teams that support instructional improvement through strategic hiring (Horng & Loeb, 2010). (More on strategic hiring is included in the next section.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Drawing upon Hitt and Tucker’s (2016) instructional leadership framework synthesis, we find that most discussions about leadership in content areas emphasize the leader’s responsibility for shepherding resources and creating conditions that facilitate teachers’ efforts to improve their instruction. These supports include providing a clear vision for mathematics and science instruction (Cobb & Jackson, 2011), establishing a robust mathematics and science curriculum (Casey, Dunlap, & Starrett, 2012b), offering professional development aligned to specific content areas (Bair & Bair, 2014; Fitzgerald & Schneider, 2013; Higgins & Bonne, 2012; Sebastian & Allensworth, 2012), and establishing teams that support instructional improvement through strategic hiring (Horng & Loeb, 2010). (More on strategic hiring is included in the next section.)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…That being said, our findings reveal important variation within and across spheres of influence in terms of the areas of education governance that policymakers found salient and that they emphasized. Bair and Bair (2014) note the importance of state legislators and other policymakers understanding "the local contexts and structural constraints within which policies are being implemented" (p. 10). Examining the stark differences we detected between spheres might be particularly useful for such pursuits.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to closing opportunity to learn gaps at the high school level, better academic preparation of students in elementary and middle school is crucial for increasing the number of historically underserved students prepared for successful pursuit of STEM careers (Venkataraman, Riordan, & Olson, 2010). As noted by Bair and Bair (2014), students who arrive at high school lacking the prerequisite skills for successfully attaining the NGSS need additional supports and more time for learning.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The NGSS "seek not only to provide students with a foundation of essential knowledge, but also to lead young people to apply their learning through scientific inquiry and the engineering-design process to deepen understanding" (Robelen, 2013, p.1). The adoption of the NGSS, along with aligned curriculum and instructional materials, is a necessary but insufficient strategy for increasing the preparation of students for STEM careers (Bair & Bair, 2014). For students to attain the NGSS, educators must improve students' opportunity to learn by focusing on "what and how well students are taught in classrooms" (Herman, 2007, p. 4).…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation