2008
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0887-3828(2008)22:2(83)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure Resistance of Historic Stone Bridge Structure of Charles Bridge. II: Susceptibility to Floods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
14
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…On the other hand, replacement of the components introduced into the structure during the 1966-1975 reconstruction is not necessary as the load-bearing capacity of the bridge is sufficient and the temperature effects seem to be stabilized. In addition, there is no need to introduce a compliant separation layer between the parapet walls as proposed in [2,3,4]; their mutual interaction is prevented by the temperatureinduced cracking, recall Table 6 Validation of non-linear mechanical model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, replacement of the components introduced into the structure during the 1966-1975 reconstruction is not necessary as the load-bearing capacity of the bridge is sufficient and the temperature effects seem to be stabilized. In addition, there is no need to introduce a compliant separation layer between the parapet walls as proposed in [2,3,4]; their mutual interaction is prevented by the temperatureinduced cracking, recall Table 6 Validation of non-linear mechanical model.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it turned out that despite a noteworthy experimental effort, the computational assessment of the bridge was based on the assumptions of linear elasticity and dimensionally reduced models, e.g. [1,2,3,4]. This naturally led to the requirement for more detailed and realistic simulations of the bridge response to relevant external impacts to provide a firmer ground for re-evaluation of the proposed reconstruction measures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerical analyses of vaulted structures made at the authors' workplace within [1] revealed the high sensitivity of vaults to the deformations of their supporting structure [42,43]. The likely cause of The numerical analysis of identically vertically loaded vaults with statically effective vault tendons (ties) did not demonstrate the formation of tensile stresses in the vault masonry.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With reference to the foundations and the soil, masonry arch bridges are often built on shallow foundations [32], [33], making them very vulnerable to scour. In order to simulate accurately the scour effects, the bridge model should also include the foundation and the surrounding soil domain.…”
Section: Mescoscale Partitioned Modelling Of Masonry Arch Bridgesmentioning
confidence: 99%