2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure prediction of skewed jointed plain concrete pavements using 3D FE analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Having a softer base allows the slab to "push in" to the base and deform, reducing the amount of stress induced and ultimately the amount of cracking (Reddy et al 1963;Eisenmann and Leykauf 1990a). For the case of traffic loading on a curled or warped slab, it is best to have a stiffer base, which will reduce the stress due to traffic loading, even though the stresses due to the curl will increase (Dere et al 2006). A stiffened base, such as an asphalt treated base, will prevent deflections, but also induce more stress in the slab than an ordinary granular base (Beckemeyer et al 2002)…”
Section: Base Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Having a softer base allows the slab to "push in" to the base and deform, reducing the amount of stress induced and ultimately the amount of cracking (Reddy et al 1963;Eisenmann and Leykauf 1990a). For the case of traffic loading on a curled or warped slab, it is best to have a stiffer base, which will reduce the stress due to traffic loading, even though the stresses due to the curl will increase (Dere et al 2006). A stiffened base, such as an asphalt treated base, will prevent deflections, but also induce more stress in the slab than an ordinary granular base (Beckemeyer et al 2002)…”
Section: Base Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even if these analytical models are valuable for getting basic information, they cannot completely describe the behavior of a square concrete slab-on-grade, especially in the cracked stage. Nowadays, in spite of the several available numerical approaches [13,[37][38][39], there is still a lack of relatively simple numerical models aiming at taking into account both the concrete post-cracking behavior and the frictional effects at the contact surface between the slab and the subgrade.…”
Section: Numerical Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The revisions of the new 2002 AASHTO 'Guide for Design of Pavement Structures' are based on mechanical-empirical procedures. There are several advantages of mechanical-empirical procedures over the traditional empirical procedures which mainly enable (Timm et al 1998, NCHRP 2002 Dere et al (2005) studied the failure prediction of skewed jointed plain concrete pavements using three dinemtional finite elements analysis. This research was performed to determine if the frailure of skewed joined plain concrete pavements could have been predicted using a 3D finite element analysis.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%