1990
DOI: 10.1016/0734-743x(90)90002-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure phenomenology of confined ceramic targets and impacting rods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
125
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 228 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
3
125
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Boundary conditions provide a shear strain rate of 5 10 /s γ = , with a uniform initial velocity gradient prescribed. In some simulations, all faces are free to expand laterally to accommodate dilatation; in others, the face on which the shear traction is applied is prohibited from expanding, thereby increasing the confining pressure that resists dilatation and impedes shear [2][3][4]. The former conditions are labeled "free"; the latter are labeled "confined."…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Boundary conditions provide a shear strain rate of 5 10 /s γ = , with a uniform initial velocity gradient prescribed. In some simulations, all faces are free to expand laterally to accommodate dilatation; in others, the face on which the shear traction is applied is prohibited from expanding, thereby increasing the confining pressure that resists dilatation and impedes shear [2][3][4]. The former conditions are labeled "free"; the latter are labeled "confined."…”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Properties of importance in the ballistic loading regime include hardness, elastic stiffness, fracture toughness, unconfined compressive strength, dynamic shear strength, and failure probabilities [1][2][3][4][5][6]. The present work investigates two ceramic materials: silicon carbide (SiC) and aluminum oxynitride (AlON).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the shock wave/compression waves from the projectile impact reach the back surface of an unconfined sample, they generate release waves that travel back towards the front surface of the sample. These intersect with release waves emanating from the front surface and edges, causing the ceramic to be put in tension and begin to laterally and radially crack ahead of the projectile, causing the formation of a characteristic fracture conoid [2,[5][6][7]. This precursor damage and comminution reduces the stress exerted on the projectile and thus substantially limits the ballistic resistance of the ceramic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high compressive strength, hardness, and low density of ceramics have driven a rapid increase of their use in ballistic protection due to their ability to defeat projectiles via interface dwell and/or substantial erosion and destruction of the penetrating tip [1][2][3]. Ceramic armor development has typically focused on composite integration in order to compensate for undesirable brittle failure during ballistic impact.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This explanation is mainly based on postmortem examination of recovered targets (6,7). A region of intense microcracking and cone cracks immediately under the impact site was observed in cross-sections of ceramic targets subjected to impacts just below the transition velocity.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%