1971
DOI: 10.1007/bf01211880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of the biguanides to improve the control of unstable diabetes treated with insulin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings seem to be at variance with the results of Perkins et al (4) who recently described intracellularly formed aragonite crystals in P. dumnetoslis. The size, morphology, and location of the crystals appear to be very similar to our calcium oxalate crystals.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…Our findings seem to be at variance with the results of Perkins et al (4) who recently described intracellularly formed aragonite crystals in P. dumnetoslis. The size, morphology, and location of the crystals appear to be very similar to our calcium oxalate crystals.…”
supporting
confidence: 58%
“…It seemed more practical at that time to simply increase the insulin dosage in order to treat the DM 13 . However, it was noted that metformin when given together with insulin to patients with type 1 DM had an insulin sparing effect 7 " 12 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In total, 47 of these publications were judged to be relevant to metformin therapy in type 1 diabetes. Analysis of publications revealed: 17 were observational studies with no random allocation and/or no comparator group [18,22,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42]; 11 were reviews, letters or commentaries [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53]; two did not contain any quantitative estimates of effects [54,55]; one concerned an outcome (erythrocyte binding of insulin) not judged relevant [56]; and four were abstracts of papers subsequently published [57][58][59][60]. Of the remaining 12 publications, one concerned insulin-requiring type 2 diabetes rather than type 1 diabetes (noted after translation) [61], and one covered a treatment period of fewer than 7 days [62].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Observational; no random allocation and/or comparator groups (n=17) [18,22,[28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] • Review, commentary, letter (n=11) [43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] • Insufficient numerical data (n=2) [54,55] • No relevant outcome (n=1) [56] • Abstract of later paper (n=4) [57][58][59][60] • No evidence of type 1 diabetes after translation (n=1)…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%