2007
DOI: 10.3208/sandf.47.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Reinforced Earth as Attacked by Typhoon No. 23 in 2004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interpretation of the failure described above provides us with a crucially important lesson; i.e., regarding the GRS wall built on a valley, it is important not to allow the formation of aquifer at the rear side of the wall and also not to allow any seepage flow into the backfill. More details of this case study are found in the literature [21,22].…”
Section: Summary Of Case Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interpretation of the failure described above provides us with a crucially important lesson; i.e., regarding the GRS wall built on a valley, it is important not to allow the formation of aquifer at the rear side of the wall and also not to allow any seepage flow into the backfill. More details of this case study are found in the literature [21,22].…”
Section: Summary Of Case Historiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the single-surface shear test, which is used in practice owing to its simple testing device mechanism, easily reproduces K 0 states of soil elements before shear and reproduces simple shear states with appropriate shear box spacing (Kim et al 2012). Therefore, there have been reports (e.g., Shibuya et al, 2007;Kasama et al, 2018) on application of strength parameters obtained from direct shear tests to elucidate collapse mechanisms of geotechnical structures and natural slopes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%