The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
1997
DOI: 10.1007/bf02867260
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Plais-Smale condition and blow-up analysis for the critical exponent problem inR 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0
2

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
35
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…By elliptic regularity, we can show that w λ belongs to C 2,γ (Ω) for some γ ∈ (0, 1). This proves (1)- (2).…”
Section: The Exponential Type Semilinear Elliptic Equation In Rsupporting
confidence: 48%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By elliptic regularity, we can show that w λ belongs to C 2,γ (Ω) for some γ ∈ (0, 1). This proves (1)- (2).…”
Section: The Exponential Type Semilinear Elliptic Equation In Rsupporting
confidence: 48%
“…From properties (5) and (6) in Theorem 4.1, we get two different situations determined by the asymptotic behaviour of f . For the detailed microscopic blow-up analysis of u λ see [2] and [4], where more general cases are considered.…”
Section: Proof Of Claimmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3]7])) as it deals with general bounded sequences rather than with critical sequences of specific functionals. Provided that a suitable extension of transformations (1.6) to non-radial functions is found, an analysis based such transformations appears to be more promising than the study of blow-ups based on the ination on the linear scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact the existence and multiplicity question seems much more difficult than its critical Sobolev exponent counterpart. Some results are known: From the result in [3], it follows that there is a λ 0 > 0 such that a solution to (1.1) exists whenever 0 < λ < λ 0 (this is in fact true for a larger class of nonlinearities with critical exponential growth). By construction this solution falls, as λ → 0, into the bubbling category (1.4) with k = 1.…”
Section: Introduction and Statement Of Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%