Low Temperature Physics LT9 1965
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4899-6443-4_122
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Matthiessen’s Rule in Plutonium

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1966
1966
1967
1967

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1 ' 5-7 Direct confirmation of this hypothesis has not been obtained from magnetic-susceptibility, 4 ' 8-10 neutron-diffraction, 11 or specific-heat 12 measurements. Those property measurements which have indicated a magnetic transition are radiation damage, [13][14][15][16] Hall effect, 3 -17 thermal expansion, 18 * 19 and thermoelectric power. 6 ' 19 The latter set of properties give indirect indications of magnetism by means of similar behavior for known magnetic metals, e.g., a manganese and the rare earths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 ' 5-7 Direct confirmation of this hypothesis has not been obtained from magnetic-susceptibility, 4 ' 8-10 neutron-diffraction, 11 or specific-heat 12 measurements. Those property measurements which have indicated a magnetic transition are radiation damage, [13][14][15][16] Hall effect, 3 -17 thermal expansion, 18 * 19 and thermoelectric power. 6 ' 19 The latter set of properties give indirect indications of magnetism by means of similar behavior for known magnetic metals, e.g., a manganese and the rare earths.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With c = Ap/Ap-p and the resistivity increase per 100 at.% Frenkel pairs App= 2.5X10"" 4 Here P is the production rate of Frenkel pairs which also includes the fraction y of unstable interstitials originally placed within the recombination volume V s around their corresponding vacancies. The parameters P = 1.34X 10"* 26 fi cm/(r/cm 2 ), r=0.1, and V s = 200 atomic volumina were obtained by fitting formula (3) to the experimental data (solid curve in Fig.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%