1979
DOI: 10.1080/09553007914550701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Irradiated Beef and Ham to Induce Genetic Aberrations in Drosophila

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1981
1981
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When tested on the irradiated chicken meat no mutagenic effect was observed. Nor had any mutagenic effect been observed in previous tests on irradiation sterilized beef and ham (Mittler 1979). Fewer progeny developed from all the groups fed diets containing chicken meat than from those fed a standard diet.…”
Section: Drosophila Mutagenesis Studymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…When tested on the irradiated chicken meat no mutagenic effect was observed. Nor had any mutagenic effect been observed in previous tests on irradiation sterilized beef and ham (Mittler 1979). Fewer progeny developed from all the groups fed diets containing chicken meat than from those fed a standard diet.…”
Section: Drosophila Mutagenesis Studymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Professor Sidney Mittler, who previously had done similar studies (Mittler 1979), remarked when asked about his view: "The fact that fewer progeny grew out of the meat diets is comforting, because it indicates that the larvae were eating the meat. That was important in these mutagenesis studies.…”
Section: Drosophila Mutagenesis Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…are consistently observed in decomposing vegetal matter ( Markow and O’Grady, 2008 ). One laboratory investigation did report feeding fruit flies with irradiated beef and ham as part of their diet in order to detect effects of food sterilization on the genetics of the consumer ( Mittler, 1979 ); so the use of decomposing animal tissue by Drosophila cannot be ruled out. In the MetaT dataset, Drosophila was often a major contributor to the sequences ( Figure 12 ), but was always a minor contributor in the MetaG data ( Figure 8 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%