Bone elongation in the postnatal animal is a result of cellular activity during endochondral ossification. Growth plate chondrocytes undergo a differentiation cascade involving stem cell clonal expansion and cellular enlargement during hypertrophy. Nutritional status has a significant effect on rates of bone growth, and a period of accelerated growth will occur if nutritional stunting of growth in early childhood can be corrected. This study focuses on changes in rates of increase in bone length in a model of catch-up growth in 4-wk-old male rats. Animals fasted for 3 d reached a weight~60% of the control littermates. By 28 d postfasting, fasted animals had regained weight to 95% of control levels. A 3-d fast caused an immediate and profound decrease in rate of growth in the proximal tibial growth plate to only 30% of that of control animals, while stopping growth in the distal tibial growth plate. During the rapid initial rate acceleration of bone elongation, growth rate in both growth plates reached that of the control littermates by 7 d postfasting. The proximal tibial growth plate then maintained rates that were 10 -15% higher than control over the rest of the experimental period. By 10 d postfasting, the previously fasted animals were on the same weight/rate trajectory as the control littermates. Changes in elongation rates were reflected by dramatic changes in growth plate morphology in all cellular zones. This is the first study to directly correlate weight recovery during catch-up with growth rate responses at the level of the growth plate. In both the prenatal and the postnatal animal, there is a complex interplay between overall nutritional status and linear bone growth. There is experimental evidence that GH/IGF-1 concentration is responsive to changing nutritional status (1-5), and growth responses to food deprivation also have been shown to involve the hormone leptin, which is secreted by adipocytes (6 -8). However, how undernutrition is translated into changing cellular activity during bone elongation has not been studied. This is significant for understanding cellular mechanisms behind the complex phenomenon of catch-up growth, which can occur to different extents, and at different rates, depending upon whether nutritional deprivation occurs in utero, during the early neonatal period of nursing, or later in postnatal growth (4 -6, 9 -12). Catch-up growth, as first described by Prader in 1963 (13), is characterized by a period of growth accelerated above normal during recovery from a period of previous deprivation, which allows the child to accelerate toward, and even resume, his/her preillness growth curve (14). A recent definition is "height velocity above the statistical limits of normality for age and/or maturity during a defined period of time, following a transient period of growth inhibition (9)."Multiple rodent models of catch-up growth have been investigated, differing in the timing of, and the nature of, the stimulus for growth retardation. The most common pharmacologically induced models...