1971
DOI: 10.1203/00006450-197102000-00002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Compensatory (Catch-up) Growth in the Rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, when examining the magnitude of the response in the present study, it is important that comparisons be made with other investigations in which the age, sex, species (and even strain) of the animals, and duration of the fast, are comparable. The percent weight loss that we recorded after a 3-dfast (29.8%, starting with male rats weighing~100 g) was comparable to that seen in several previous similarly designed studies: 25% loss, starting at weights of~120 g (26); 42.8% loss, starting at weights of~70 g (17); and 28% loss, starting at weights of~125 g (16). Thus, this model is one of acute and severe nutritional deprivation, in which we have demonstrated that changes in bone growth rates are even more dramatic than changes in rates of weight gain/ loss.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, when examining the magnitude of the response in the present study, it is important that comparisons be made with other investigations in which the age, sex, species (and even strain) of the animals, and duration of the fast, are comparable. The percent weight loss that we recorded after a 3-dfast (29.8%, starting with male rats weighing~100 g) was comparable to that seen in several previous similarly designed studies: 25% loss, starting at weights of~120 g (26); 42.8% loss, starting at weights of~70 g (17); and 28% loss, starting at weights of~125 g (16). Thus, this model is one of acute and severe nutritional deprivation, in which we have demonstrated that changes in bone growth rates are even more dramatic than changes in rates of weight gain/ loss.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…The most common pharmacologically induced models to rapidly slow growth use either the anti-thyroid agent PTU (15)(16)(17) or dexamethasone (5,14,(17)(18)(19). Models in which manipulation of nutrition is the primary variable include 1) food restriction to the mother during gestation and/or lactation (20,21); 2) bilateral uterine artery ligation during late gestation (22,23); 3) manipulation of litter size during weaning, contrasting litters of four pups to litters of 16 or more pups (11,18,24); and 4) short periods of fasting to the postweaning animal (3,5,17,(25)(26)(27)(28)(29). These experiments have demonstrated that the timing and the duration of the stimulus are critical, with differing outcomes in prenatal/postnatal and preweaning/postweaning experiments (27).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Full catch-up after early malnutrition in rats was demonstrated (32) when measurements were continued until growth ceased at about 32 weeks of age. Less prolonged studies showed failure of rats to compensate for cortisone-induced growth retardation (20). The long-term deleterious effect on growth in children arises from the disproportionate effect of corticosteroids on velocity oi' linear growth and skeletal maturation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mosier (21) proposed that incomplete compensatory growth in rats given cortisone as weanlings might be attributable to alterations in chondrocytes. Laron et al (20) described morphologic changes in the epiphyseal cartilage of rats given large dose corticosteroids (6-methylprednisolone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%