2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08944
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure mode and effect analysis (FMEA) to identify and mitigate failures in a hospital rapid response system (RRS)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We made our best efforts to familiarise the survey respondents with both types of RRS to overcome this limitation. Our findings are also supported by another study conducted by the authors utilising Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) to identify failure modes within the existing paper based RRS [ 27 ]. This recent FMEA also supports that an electronic RRS could address a majority of the issues perceived as key problems within the paper based RRS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…We made our best efforts to familiarise the survey respondents with both types of RRS to overcome this limitation. Our findings are also supported by another study conducted by the authors utilising Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) to identify failure modes within the existing paper based RRS [ 27 ]. This recent FMEA also supports that an electronic RRS could address a majority of the issues perceived as key problems within the paper based RRS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The FMEA stages used in the study were developed based on the stages conducted by Ullah et al (2022), shown in Figure 1. The survey results of business locations are used as a basis for identifying risk sources.…”
Section: Failure Mode Effect Analysis (Fmea)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These three factors are evaluated on a predefined scale, the range of which is usually 1-5 or 1-10. According to the old approach, the product of these three values gave the risk priority number, in descending order of which the risks with the highest value were the most severe, requiring further action [7] . In the new edition of the FMEA handbook, this has already been defined differently, with the introduction of the action priority assessment that looks at the combinations of the three values according to the table in the handbook.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%