2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.fpc.2022.02.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure mode analysis of electronic detonator under high overload condition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considering the rock mass properties, the delay time between holes was selected as 25 ms (MS2), the delay time between rows as 75 ms (MS4), and the delay time of charge in holes as 460 ms (MS11). Because the actual and the nominal delay of detonator have large discreteness [37][38][39], there is normally a delay error. Terefore, in the actual initiation process, a hole-by-hole initiation with a small delay time was adopted [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Detonation Tubes Detonated Hole-by-holementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering the rock mass properties, the delay time between holes was selected as 25 ms (MS2), the delay time between rows as 75 ms (MS4), and the delay time of charge in holes as 460 ms (MS11). Because the actual and the nominal delay of detonator have large discreteness [37][38][39], there is normally a delay error. Terefore, in the actual initiation process, a hole-by-hole initiation with a small delay time was adopted [40][41][42][43].…”
Section: Detonation Tubes Detonated Hole-by-holementioning
confidence: 99%