2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.06.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure mechanisms of additively manufactured porous biomaterials: Effects of porosity and type of unit cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
130
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 280 publications
(143 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
11
130
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in accordance with the results of Cheng et al [64], Xiao et al [65] and Li et al [23]. Using computationally predicted deformation models, Kadkhodapour et al [66] show that a layer-by-layer failure mechanism applies to stretch-dominated structures (i.e., cubic unit cell) while bending-dominated structures (i.e., twisted, pyramidal) show shear bands at 45˝. Due to the geometrical variation of the structural design, the elastic modulus could be varied between 7 GPa and approximately 22 GPa for the cubic design, between 3 GPa and approximately 7 GPa for the pyramidal design and between 17 GPa and 26 GPa for the twisted design.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This is in accordance with the results of Cheng et al [64], Xiao et al [65] and Li et al [23]. Using computationally predicted deformation models, Kadkhodapour et al [66] show that a layer-by-layer failure mechanism applies to stretch-dominated structures (i.e., cubic unit cell) while bending-dominated structures (i.e., twisted, pyramidal) show shear bands at 45˝. Due to the geometrical variation of the structural design, the elastic modulus could be varied between 7 GPa and approximately 22 GPa for the cubic design, between 3 GPa and approximately 7 GPa for the pyramidal design and between 17 GPa and 26 GPa for the twisted design.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…To understand the failure mechanisms of different lattice structures, as experimentally observed, Kadkhodapour et al [98] implemented John-Cook plasticity and damage model in the cubic and diamond unit cell FE models based on the CAD design to simulate the failure behavior of Ti-6Al-4V scaffolds under compression. Their results obtained from FE simulations are shown in Figure 3.…”
Section: Computational and Experimental Studies On Bte Scaffoldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shearing of layers is accompanied by the bending failure of tying struts perpendicular to the diagonal plates; and ( b ) the cubic lattice structure; layer-by-layer deformation mechanism is confirmed by stretch-dominated deformation in scaling law analysis [98]. …”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…11, showing how the value of E changes with the relative density of a series of randomly-structured porous samples made from non-alloyed titanium. The majority of reported data Data are from [15, 20, 22, 25, 35, 41, 47, 55-57, 60, 66, 67, 90-100] [73,[101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109][110] . Fig.…”
Section: Uniaxialmentioning
confidence: 99%