Proceedings of the Joint ACM SIGSOFT Conference -- QoSA and ACM SIGSOFT Symposium -- ISARCS on Quality of Software Architecture 2011
DOI: 10.1145/2000259.2000279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure-dependent execution time analysis

Abstract: The growing complexity of safety-critical embedded systems is leading to an increased complexity of safety analysis models. Often used fault tolerance mechanisms have complex failure behavior and produce overhead compared to systems without such mechanisms. The question arises whether the overhead for fault tolerance is acceptable for the increased safety of a system. Manually modeling the timing behavior is cost intensive and error prone. Current approaches of safety analysis and execution time analysis are n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the traditional methods are designed for the system with static architecture, which are not powerful enough for evaluating the dependability of SCPS. In this survey, we focus on the dependability evaluation methods for dynamic system (SCPS can be considered as a kind of dynamic system), and the detailed introduction of traditional dependability V&V methods refers to [ 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 ].…”
Section: Guarantee the Dependability Of The Design With Model Basementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the traditional methods are designed for the system with static architecture, which are not powerful enough for evaluating the dependability of SCPS. In this survey, we focus on the dependability evaluation methods for dynamic system (SCPS can be considered as a kind of dynamic system), and the detailed introduction of traditional dependability V&V methods refers to [ 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 ].…”
Section: Guarantee the Dependability Of The Design With Model Basementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory and traditional means of dependability [ 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 , 107 , 108 , 109 ] have been well-studied for a long time. As the investigations listed in Table 1 indicate, the traditional dependability methods are still the mainstream choice to guarantee the dependability of SCPS, which get impressive results, especially in guaranteeing the dependability of infrastructures.…”
Section: Self-healing Solution For Scpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the traditional methods are designed for the system with static architecture, which are not powerful enough for evaluating the dependability of SCPS. In this survey, we focus on the dependability evaluation methods for dynamic system (SCPS can be considered as a kind of dynamic system), and the detailed introduction of traditional dependability V&V methods refers to [102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109].…”
Section: Current Researches On Model Based Dependability Vandv For Scpsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The theory and traditional means of dependability [102][103][104][105][106][107][108][109] have been well-studied for a long time. As the investigations listed in Table 1 indicate, the traditional dependability methods are still the mainstream choice to guarantee the dependability of SCPS, which get impressive results, especially in guaranteeing the dependability of infrastructures.…”
Section: Traditional Solutions To Improve the Dependability Of Infrasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The traditional dependability V&V methods are surveyed in [155][156][157][158][159][160][161][162]. These methods include Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) e. Another useful method to improve the dependability is the fault injection.…”
Section: The Traditional Dependability Means and Vandvmentioning
confidence: 99%