1997
DOI: 10.1016/s1359-6462(97)00447-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure Criteria of Dentin-Resin Tensile Bond Test—A Fracture Mechanics Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We further ascertained that at a = 0.15 the critical stress intensity factor and minimum stress intensity factor coefficient could also be found. This result implies that 0.15D is actually the critical crack length for the specimen geometry modeled in this study, and is similar to the value proposed by Lin et al [8] though they left the peripheral precrack out of their consideration. Thus, the minimum J-integral which occurs at the critical crack length can be considered the critical J-integral and corresponds to the critical load of the tensile test.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We further ascertained that at a = 0.15 the critical stress intensity factor and minimum stress intensity factor coefficient could also be found. This result implies that 0.15D is actually the critical crack length for the specimen geometry modeled in this study, and is similar to the value proposed by Lin et al [8] though they left the peripheral precrack out of their consideration. Thus, the minimum J-integral which occurs at the critical crack length can be considered the critical J-integral and corresponds to the critical load of the tensile test.…”
supporting
confidence: 88%
“…In 1998, Lin et al first proposed the failure criteria of a dentin-resin tensile bond test through a fracture mechanics approach [8]. In that study, an analytical method was used by deriving fracture mechanics-based equations to obtain the mode I fracture toughness, K IC , and Y, a dimensionless stress intensity factor coefficient.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So, this is an expected relationship, and is in agreement with the findings of Sano et al 6 and Phrukkanon, Burrow, and Tyas, 8 who in their previous works established the importance of the area size related to the tensile tests. The first used areas ranging from 0.25 to 11.65 mm 2 and other methodology and the second from 1.1 to 3.1 mm 2 . The present study employs areas ranging from 0.69 to 110.86 mm 2 , a range much wider than these works.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The determination of bond strength of dental adhesives to hard dental tissues is a matter of importance, in accordance with the great changes that adhesive techniques have produced in dentistry [1]. Usually, this bond strength is determined measuring the tensile or shear load at failure [2] between the adhesive and the substrate, divided by the cross-sectional area (BA) of the bonded interface to be tested [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%