2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0308-0161(03)00107-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure assessment diagram analysis of creep crack initiation in 316H stainless steel

Abstract: In this work the time dependent failure assessment diagram (TDFAD) approach is applied to the study of crack initiation in Type 316H stainless steel, a material commonly used in high temperature applications. A TDFAD has been constructed for the steel at a temperature of 550 o C, and was found to be relatively insensitive to time. The TDFAD procedure is then applied to predict initiation times, at increments of creep crack growth Δa = 0.2 mm and Δa = 0.5 mm, for tests on compact tension specimens and the resul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with the experimental results in ultra-large CT specimens reported by Tabuchi et al [21]. Higher constraint will lead to shorter creep crack initiation (CCI) time, higher CCG rate and lower creep fracture toughness (which is the creep toughness corresponding to a given crack extension at a given time [40]). Hence the creep cracks will firstly initiate and propagate at the mid-plane region along the crack front, and which will lead to the crack tunneling.…”
Section: Quantitative Characterization Of the Out-of-plane Creep Conssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is consistent with the experimental results in ultra-large CT specimens reported by Tabuchi et al [21]. Higher constraint will lead to shorter creep crack initiation (CCI) time, higher CCG rate and lower creep fracture toughness (which is the creep toughness corresponding to a given crack extension at a given time [40]). Hence the creep cracks will firstly initiate and propagate at the mid-plane region along the crack front, and which will lead to the crack tunneling.…”
Section: Quantitative Characterization Of the Out-of-plane Creep Conssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As can be seen in Fig. 12a and described in 9 the 316H TDFAD is insensitive to time and deviates little from the R6 option 1 curve. The P22 TDFAD however, is in relatively good agreement with the R6 Option 1 curve at time 0 h, but almost instantly deviates significantly from it.…”
Section: Tdfad Formationmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Note that predicted loci depend also on plane stress and plane strain limit load solutions as discussed in detail in [28]. The lowest L r or K r locus corresponds to the lowest time of 10 hrs, where its value increases with time.…”
Section: P22 Steel At 550°cmentioning
confidence: 87%