2013
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.845.403
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure Analysis of Cementless Hip Joint Prosthesis

Abstract: In this changing global scenario, modification, transplantation, and replacement can be the eternal solution for most of the problems in the medical field. Hence replacement technique finds a very prominent place in medicine as a remedy having closely tied up with biomechanics. One of the most important joints in the human body is the hip joint, the big and complex joint. Many researches were conducted and many are in progress, but most of these works use simplified models with either 2D or 3D approaches. The … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figure 7, the maximum stress is located at the neck region area of the hip implant for all three designs. The observation was similar to another study, in which the maximum VMS occurred below the neck for the medial part, and as for the lateral side, it happened around one-third of the distance from the neck region [35,51]. Not only that, but the von Mises stress was also distributed throughout the implant until the distal part.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…As shown in Figure 7, the maximum stress is located at the neck region area of the hip implant for all three designs. The observation was similar to another study, in which the maximum VMS occurred below the neck for the medial part, and as for the lateral side, it happened around one-third of the distance from the neck region [35,51]. Not only that, but the von Mises stress was also distributed throughout the implant until the distal part.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Furthermore, new design helps in reduction of maximum interface shear stress by about 50% on the lateral and medial aspects of the femur as compared with titanium stem. Also reduction of 17% and 11% is found on the lateral and medial facets of the femur, respectively, when comparing with model II of FGM [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%