2014
DOI: 10.1007/s11668-014-9847-x
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure Analysis and Finite Element Simulation of Above Ground Oil–Gas Pipeline Impacted by Rockfall

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It might be due to the adjustment of stresses in the pipeline with a variation of pressure and thickness. It can be concluded that if the pipeline were subjected to a pressure between 150 kPa and 250 kPa at a small exposed length, the shear failure would happen, and the same failure mechanism was reported in similar studies in the literature [19,37].…”
Section: Von Mises Stressessupporting
confidence: 67%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It might be due to the adjustment of stresses in the pipeline with a variation of pressure and thickness. It can be concluded that if the pipeline were subjected to a pressure between 150 kPa and 250 kPa at a small exposed length, the shear failure would happen, and the same failure mechanism was reported in similar studies in the literature [19,37].…”
Section: Von Mises Stressessupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Furthermore, previously published literature [24][25][26] and many oil and gas companies such as Transredes oil and gas pipeline, Bolivia [22] Pacific northern gas pipeline in British Columbia, Canada [27], and most recently Sabah and Sarawak gas pipeline, Malaysia [28] conducted an in-depth investigation in the failure of pipelines. The latter suggested a detailed investigation of pipeline failure due to the impact of debris flow by considering the relevant parameters of wall thickness and impact angle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The yield stress σ y of X80 is 596 MPa. Young's modulus of steel material equal to 210 GPa, Poisson's ratio is 0.30, density is 7800 kg/m 3 [14,15]. Considering a safety factor equal to 0.72, and the maximum operating pressure P max of this pipeline, given by P max =0.722σ y t/D.…”
Section: Fig 2 Finite Element Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ismail et al [7] used FEM to evaluate the influence of pipeline's diameter, buried depth, wall thickness and other parameters on the resistance to upheaval buckling of buried submarine pipeline. Zhang et al [33] analyzed the pipeline's deformation caused by radial impact, inclined impact, and eccentric impact of spherical rockfall and cubic rockfall. The results indicated that the smaller the curvature radius of the rockfall contact area is, the greater the damage to the pipeline will be.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%