2006
DOI: 10.1080/13876980600682089
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failing family policy in post-communist Central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
78
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
78
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…In many of those countries childcare provision for the youngest children (under age 3) is even worse than in many western European countries and men's levels of involvement in unpaid labor at home are relatively low (Fisher and Robinson 2011). Instead, women are offered extensive parental leave opportunities to provide care at home (Saxonberg and Sirovátka 2006;Robila 2012). Nonetheless, in our study we found that raising children does not affect women's employment in this part of Europe in general and has an only slightly negative effect on the probability of working among partnered women.…”
Section: Discussion Of Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many of those countries childcare provision for the youngest children (under age 3) is even worse than in many western European countries and men's levels of involvement in unpaid labor at home are relatively low (Fisher and Robinson 2011). Instead, women are offered extensive parental leave opportunities to provide care at home (Saxonberg and Sirovátka 2006;Robila 2012). Nonetheless, in our study we found that raising children does not affect women's employment in this part of Europe in general and has an only slightly negative effect on the probability of working among partnered women.…”
Section: Discussion Of Key Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, social expectations were reinforced, emphasising different social roles for men and women. These processes gradually turned re-familisation into an accepted and crystallised norm in these countries (Saxonberg and Sirovátka, 2006). (This can be contrasted with the de-familisation process which occurred in Scandinavian countries accompanied by greater access for females to paid labour, better general access to welfare services and the more active role of fathers in child care.…”
Section: Re-familisation In Cee Countriesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation is exacerbated by the limited access to child-care facilities (Scharle, 2007). According to several studies (Saxonberg and Sirovátka, 2006;Szikra and Szelewa, 2010;Klenner and Hasková, 2010;Křížková et al, 2010;Plomien, 2009) in all post-socialist countries except Slovenia familialism is dominant and can be identified in the poor availability and insufficient quality of childcare and care for the elderly. Long parental leave schemes, as mentioned previously, might also serve as a double-edge sword when it comes to the return of mothers to the labour market.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formánková and Dobrotić 2011] (the result of sharp decrease in the availability and affordability of childcare services, parental leave for up to three years, and the unavailability of part-time and fl exible working hours) [Blum, Formánková and Dobrotić 2014;Křížková and Vohlídalová 2009]. As a consequence of these policies and the gendered norms of a traditional division of work and care in couples and families, in the Czech Republic we can see the motherhood has a signifi cant negative impact on female employment [Saxonberg and Sirovátka 2006;Křížková and Vohlídalová 2009].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%