Through qualitative analyses of 50 in-depth interviews with Catholics in three Midwestern cities, I investigate the role of religious movement organizations in the formation of Catholic identities. I find that movement organizations and elites tend to have little direct impact on the formation of Catholic parishioners' identities in my sample. While movements' disruptions and interactions with media are useful for generating debate and wider recognition of religious disagreements, my respondents are not usually socialized by nor do they identify with familiar movements when they call themselves traditional, moderate, and liberal. Most are uninterested in and unacquainted with movement organizations and publications. Instead, their religious identification is a form of religious mapping, which reflects their self-understood position vis-à-vis recognized cultural conflicts within the larger religious community. While movements play a limited role, I argue that we should be wary of conceptualizing Catholic identities as products of movement groups or parachurch networks since most Catholic identity-work occurs within families and parishes, as opposed to movements or parachurch organizations.Galvanized by the (re)emergence of the Christian Right into politics, researchers have become increasingly interested in politicized religious identities and the consequences of these identities for politics and social change. Robert Wuthnow (1988Wuthnow ( , 1989) studied the emergence of divisions between religious conservatives and liberals since World War II. ) investigated and debated the existence of a culture war between religious progressives and the orthodox of all faiths. In addition, political scientists and sociologists examined various Protestant religious self-identifications, including evangelical, liberal, pentecostal, mainline, and fundamentalist (