2017
DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12203
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failed expectations: Quality of government and support for populist parties in Europe

Abstract: This article addresses an issue previously neglected in the research on support for populist parties: How do perceptions of the local quality of government (QoG) and local service delivery affect voters’ propensity to vote for a populist party? It argues that personal experience with poor QoG makes voters more likely to support populist parties. The argument highlights the interplay between supply and demand factors in explaining populist support and discusses why populist parties have been particularly succes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
24
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Dahlberg and Holmberg (2014) argue that citizens' evaluation of how democracy works is substantially more affected by the presence of effective, impartial and professional governmental institutions than by things like ideological congruence between voters and representatives and different electoral system characteristics. Research also shows that corruption perceptions can affect external political efficacy (Kostadinova 2009), voter turnout (Stockemer et al 2013), and vote choice (Agerberg 2017). What implications does this research have for the relationship between education and political behavior?…”
Section: Corruption and Education In Democraciesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Dahlberg and Holmberg (2014) argue that citizens' evaluation of how democracy works is substantially more affected by the presence of effective, impartial and professional governmental institutions than by things like ideological congruence between voters and representatives and different electoral system characteristics. Research also shows that corruption perceptions can affect external political efficacy (Kostadinova 2009), voter turnout (Stockemer et al 2013), and vote choice (Agerberg 2017). What implications does this research have for the relationship between education and political behavior?…”
Section: Corruption and Education In Democraciesmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Most of the world's countries suffer from corruption and poor quality of government (albeit, of course, to different degrees). 1 My main claim in this dissertation is that this matters for political life and for political behavior among citizens, in ways previously overlooked. As illustrated in the Brazilian example above, big corruption scandals can change the logic of politics and erode peoples' trust in politicians and the political system.…”
Section: Sammanfattning På Svenskamentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this dissertation I identify three themes, based on a broad reading of previous research, that may serve as a point of departure for researchers thinking about the relationship between corruption/quality of government (QoG) and political behavior. The themes are, in brief: (1) corruption is something that people are deeply concerned about, (2) corruption and QoG shape the relationship between the individual and the state, (3) corruption and QoG affect citizens' belief about the capacity of the democratic state. The insights underlying these themes are under-appreciated in the political behavior-literature and have only recently started to become acknowledged as significant factors shaping indi-1 INTRODUCTION viduals' political thinking.…”
Section: Sammanfattning På Svenskamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If economic pessimism is associated with a preference for dominant behaviour, as this research suggests, this may help us understand why voters in beleaguered economies (or economic sectors) sometimes find dominant and/or populist candidates appealing (Agerberg 2017). This relationship may be further intensified if additional sources of negative sentiment are present in the electorate, which could also increase the appeal of dominant leaders.…”
Section: It Is Clear That Yes and No Voters Believed Strikingly Diffementioning
confidence: 95%