2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcde.2019.01.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fail-safe optimization of beam structures

Abstract: In the current work, a fail-safe optimization of beam structures is carried out. This approach may provide an insight into the robustness of lattice structures. The use of beam elements allows a commonly used engineering approach for obtaining a fail-safe design to be applied. This consists of removing one beam element at a time and optimizing the remaining structure. At the end of the process, the maximum beam radii are used for the final design. This approach is computationally extremely expensive for lattic… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…44,45 However, reliability-based optimization approaches rely on statistics and probabilistic analyses, whereas fail-safe approaches rely on the definition of worst case locations of failure scenarios and their associated optimization constraints. 46,47 In the context of more traditional structural design applications, the fail-safe optimization for static loading has received an increasing attention by several researchers. One of the first contributions is from 1976 by Sun et al, 48 in the field of fail-safe truss structural optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…44,45 However, reliability-based optimization approaches rely on statistics and probabilistic analyses, whereas fail-safe approaches rely on the definition of worst case locations of failure scenarios and their associated optimization constraints. 46,47 In the context of more traditional structural design applications, the fail-safe optimization for static loading has received an increasing attention by several researchers. One of the first contributions is from 1976 by Sun et al, 48 in the field of fail-safe truss structural optimization.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, the fail‐safe optimization subject falls into the category of design involving uncertainties, known generally as reliability‐based design optimization (RBDO) 44,45 . However, reliability‐based optimization approaches rely on statistics and probabilistic analyses, whereas fail‐safe approaches rely on the definition of worst case locations of failure scenarios and their associated optimization constraints 46,47 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the literature, fail-safe structural optimization has long been developed to achieve fail-safe design by including damage scenarios or failure modes into the design optimization problem, see e.g. Sun et al (1976); Achtziger and Bendsøe (1999); Jansen et al (2014); Zhou and Fleury (2016); Peng and Sui (2018); Lüdeker and Kriegesmann (2019); Stolpe (2019); Pollini (2020); Ambrozkiewicz and Kriegesmann (2020). Previous studies have considered complete loss of one arbitrary member in frame structures (Sun et al, 1976;Lüdeker and Kriegesmann, 2019;Stolpe, 2019), or complete loss of one arbitrary element/patch of material in continuum structures (Jansen et al, 2014;Zhou and Fleury, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, this optimization strategy achieves a fail-safe design with the minimum penalty weight over the intact structure. Lüdeker and Kriegesmann (2019) carried out the fail-safe optimization of beam structures, providing an insight into the robustness of lattice structures. Furthermore, if random parameters are considered in the optimization process, the multi-model Reliability-Based Design Optimization (RBDO) approach was proposed by Cid et al (2018) to obtain the fail-safe optimum design under uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%