1998
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1050(199802)7:1<21::aid-hec306>3.0.co;2-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer: is it cost-effective?

Abstract: Recently published evidence from two large-scale clinical trials conducted in England and in Denmark suggests that faecal occult blood screening for colorectal cancer significantly reduces mortality. However, before screening can be advocated as part of national health policy, its cost-effectiveness must be demonstrated. The English screening trial has been the subject of a detailed economic evaluation over the past 10 years In this paper, cost-effectiveness estimates of screening are presented, based on cost … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
54
0
1

Year Published

1998
1998
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(23 reference statements)
1
54
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14 On the other hand, the program is expected to have a similar cost-effectiveness to the current cervical cancer screening and breast cancer screening programs. 7,8,10 Our study differs from previously published cost-effectiveness studies in several respects. The main difference is the comparison of the age group at which to start screening.…”
Section: Stone Et Al Articlementioning
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…13,14 On the other hand, the program is expected to have a similar cost-effectiveness to the current cervical cancer screening and breast cancer screening programs. 7,8,10 Our study differs from previously published cost-effectiveness studies in several respects. The main difference is the comparison of the age group at which to start screening.…”
Section: Stone Et Al Articlementioning
confidence: 62%
“…13,14 There has only been one previous study to our knowledge that has used a similar measure, the QALY, in an evaluation of FOBT screening for CRC. 10 Both DALYs and YLLs are reported here to allow direct comparison with other economic studies that have used life-years saved, which are reported to be a standard and more reliably measured health benefit. 30 Part of that concern is the reliability of the disability weight and the estimation of the YLDs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The cost of an individual colonoscopy has been shown to impact the cost 3 and cost-effectiveness [4][5][6] of colorectal cancer screening. Published estimates of colonoscopy cost vary widely [7][8][9][10] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By itself however, such evidence of effectiveness in reducing mortality is insufficient to justify the implementation of a national mass population screening programme: logistical, ethical, psychological and economic issues are only some of the considerations that must be addressed in order that the chance that the patient will benefit from the screening procedure substantially outweighs the risk of harm from it. Indeed several authors have argued against the use of FOBT in screening the general population [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%