2019
DOI: 10.1111/jam.14167
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faecal freezing preservation period influences colonization ability for faecal microbiota transplantation

Abstract: Aims There has been growing interest in faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) as treatment. Although, frozen donor faeces preserved at −20°C has been widely used for practical advantages, freezing at −20°C can affect bacterial viability. Adequacy evaluation of fresh and frozen faeces as the transplant is necessary for the methodological improvement of FMT. Methods and Results The viable bacterial compositions of faecal specimens under fresh and freezing conditions were compared by a microbiome analysis using… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Takahashi et al (2019) showed that in a murine model, enteric colonization by Bacteroidetes, but not that of Firmicutes, was reduced by 1-month frozen storage of a fecal suspension, which is consistent with a higher sensitivity of Bacteroidetes to stressful conditions, as suggested in the present study. Interestingly, in the study of Takahashi et al, in vitro bacterial viability, assessed by propidium monoazide (PMA) 16S community profiling, was not significantly changed during 1month cryopreservation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, Takahashi et al (2019) showed that in a murine model, enteric colonization by Bacteroidetes, but not that of Firmicutes, was reduced by 1-month frozen storage of a fecal suspension, which is consistent with a higher sensitivity of Bacteroidetes to stressful conditions, as suggested in the present study. Interestingly, in the study of Takahashi et al, in vitro bacterial viability, assessed by propidium monoazide (PMA) 16S community profiling, was not significantly changed during 1month cryopreservation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Refreezing once defrosted is not permitted. Recently it has been shown that long-term preservation of transplanted feces at −20 • C can result in instability (especially concerning Actinobacteria and Bacteroidetes phyla) of the clinical outcome in FMT therapy [52].…”
Section: Cryoconservationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratorists check for the presence of any pathogens, such as HIV, HBV, HCV, Treponema pallidum , Human T-lymphotropic virus I and II, Plasmodium spp., Trypanosoma spp., Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Campylobacter spp., Escherichia coli O157 H7, Yersinia , vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Gram-negative multidrug-resistant bacteria, Norovirus , antigens and/or acid fast staining for Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium parvum , protozoa (including Blastocystis hominis ), helminths, and fecal occult blood testing. Regarding the laboratory preparation method, it is possible to choose between two different procedures: fresh and frozen preparations (22, 23). The first procedure requires that the feces of the donor be processed within 6 h after defecation to preserve the integrity of the anaerobic bacteria (24).…”
Section: Fecal Microbiota Transplantationmentioning
confidence: 99%