2011
DOI: 10.3161/000164511x625937
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faecal Analysis as a Method of Nestling Diet Determination in Insectivorous Birds: A Case Study in Blue TitsCyanistes caeruleusand Great TitsParus major

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The abundance of caterpillars is almost always relatively low in the parkland site and, therefore, Blue Tits have to use a greater proportion of alternative prey sources, which could obscure a potential relation between physiological indices and year-to-year differences in the amount of caterpillar frassfall. Michalski et al (2011) who analysed droppings of tits in both our study areas, showed that a proportion of non-caterpillar prey delivered to nestlings is higher in the parkland area than in the forest. This may suggest that caterpillar abundance may be a more important determinant factor for Blue Tit breeding parameters and physiological condition in the forest than in the parkland area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The abundance of caterpillars is almost always relatively low in the parkland site and, therefore, Blue Tits have to use a greater proportion of alternative prey sources, which could obscure a potential relation between physiological indices and year-to-year differences in the amount of caterpillar frassfall. Michalski et al (2011) who analysed droppings of tits in both our study areas, showed that a proportion of non-caterpillar prey delivered to nestlings is higher in the parkland area than in the forest. This may suggest that caterpillar abundance may be a more important determinant factor for Blue Tit breeding parameters and physiological condition in the forest than in the parkland area.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although both species are commonly described as ecologically similar to each other, the blue tit is more than the great tit specialized in the preference for deciduous breeding habitats and in feeding nestlings with tree canopy caterpillars [52], [53], [73], [74]. In our study system, we previously found that the food of nestling great tits contained a lower percentage of caterpillars than in the case of blue tits and that the proportion of caterpillars in the diet was lower in the parkland than in the forest in great tits, whereas there was no difference in blue tits [82]. This suggests that in generally worse trophic conditions of the parkland site great tits preyed more frequently on alternative prey, while blue tits kept foraging on caterpillars, probably at some cost that might generate additional stress.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Most frequently only qualitative assessment of the diet of predators has been determined, either through direct observation of predation events or identification of prey remnants in predator's alimentary tract or faeces (Harwood and Obrycki 2005;Michalski et al 2011). An attempt to quantify the effect of invertebrate predators on H. axyridis and the two-spot ladybird, Adalia bipunctata (L.), was made in northern Italy by Burgio et al (2008).…”
Section: Predators Of Harmonia Axyridismentioning
confidence: 99%