2022
DOI: 10.1002/acp.3987
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fading affect bias in Mexico: Differential fading of emotional intensity in death memories and everyday negative memories

Abstract: Fading affect bias (FAB) is a phenomenon wherein the intensity of negative emotions associated with an autobiographical memory decrease more rapidly than the intensity of positive emotions. The present study had three aims: (1) to determine whether FAB could be replicated in extreme event memories (the loss of loved ones) in the Mexican culture; (2) to determine whether greater fading would occur in psychologically closed compared to unresolved memories; and (3) whether depression and posttraumatic stress diso… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
(97 reference statements)
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The phenomenon has been demonstrated via multiple methodologies using experimental (Landau & Gunter, 2009), daily diary (Ritchie & Skowronski, 2008;Ritchie et al, 2009) or cross-sectional retrospective designs (Gibbons & Lee, 2019). Fading affect bias is also present in both child and adult populations (Gibbons & Rollins, 2021;Rollins et al, 2018), and across multiple national samples from both individualistic and collectivist countries (Bond et al, 2016(Bond et al, , 2022Ritchie et al, 2015). Finally, fading affect bias is also found when using cued recall to specific memories (Schrauf & Hoffman, 2007), and across different affective perceptions of the same flashbulb memories (Bohn & Berntsen, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon has been demonstrated via multiple methodologies using experimental (Landau & Gunter, 2009), daily diary (Ritchie & Skowronski, 2008;Ritchie et al, 2009) or cross-sectional retrospective designs (Gibbons & Lee, 2019). Fading affect bias is also present in both child and adult populations (Gibbons & Rollins, 2021;Rollins et al, 2018), and across multiple national samples from both individualistic and collectivist countries (Bond et al, 2016(Bond et al, , 2022Ritchie et al, 2015). Finally, fading affect bias is also found when using cued recall to specific memories (Schrauf & Hoffman, 2007), and across different affective perceptions of the same flashbulb memories (Bohn & Berntsen, 2007).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenon has been demonstrated in children as well as adults (Rollins et al, 2018), occurs for dreams (T. D. Ritchie & Skowronski, 2008), personal event memories (e.g., Walker et al, 1997), interpersonal (Crawford, Hammond, & Marsh, 2023;Zengel et al, 2019) and intergroup interactions (Birtel et al, 2021), and for experiences of services and brands (Kim & Jang, 2014;Raghubir & Latimer, 2013). FAB is considered a "pan-cultural" phenomenon found in both collectivist and individualist cultures (Bond et al, 2016(Bond et al, , 2022; T. D. Ritchie et al, 2015).…”
Section: Fabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The differential fading serves to remove affect (especially negative affect), to maintain a positive view of life (Colombo et al, 2020;Sedikides & Skowronski, 2020;Skowronski et al, 2014;. The strength of the FAB has been shown to be attenuated by various psychopathologies, including depression (Gibbons & Lee, 2019;Marsh et al, 2019), posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms (Bond et al, 2022), dysphoria (Walker et al, 2003), anxiety (Gibbons & Lee, 2019;Walker et al, 2014), stress (Gibbons & Lee, 2019), and eating disorder symptomology (T. D. Ritchie et al, 2019). Although attenuations of FAB are more commonly explored in the literature, there is also research suggesting the phenomenon can be heightened.…”
Section: Fabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the healthy variables, unhealthy variables are negatively related to the FAB and some of those variables include sexual depression (Gibbons, Dunlap, et al, 2021), dispositional mood (Ritchie et al, 2009), as well as depression, anxiety, and stress (Gibbons et al, 2017; Gibbons & Lee, 2019; Walker et al, 2014). Other unhealthy variables involved immature death attitudes (Gibbons et al, 2018), elevated social media watching (Gibbons et al, 2017), PTSD symptoms in Mexican participants recalling death events (Bond et al, 2022), eating disorder symptoms (Ritchie et al, 2019), as well as parental risk for physical abuse (Skowronski et al, 2016), particularly if parents were recalling childhood events (Crouch et al, 2022). Research uncovered additional unhealthy variables, which included marijuana consumption (Pillersdorf & Scoboria, 2019), and the recall of false autobiographical memories for events from a 1‐week diary study (Gibbons, Dunlap, et al, 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%