1980
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-232x.1980.tb01093.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faculty Unionization: The Pre‐Yeshiva Years, 1966–1979

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whether or not faculty unions would ultimately take control of faculty senates was not clear. However, speculation centered on the possibility that collective bargaining by faculty unions would become the dominant form of faculty governance in higher education (e.g., Garbarino 1980). Although the notion of a complete demise of faculty senates was not widely held, it was clear that unions did have the power to curtail faculty senate influence over economic issues and that unions had the potential to share jurisdiction with senates in a number of key areas such as personnel decision making (Baldridge and Kemerer 1976).…”
Section: Academic Collective Bargaining and Faculty Governance: A Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether or not faculty unions would ultimately take control of faculty senates was not clear. However, speculation centered on the possibility that collective bargaining by faculty unions would become the dominant form of faculty governance in higher education (e.g., Garbarino 1980). Although the notion of a complete demise of faculty senates was not widely held, it was clear that unions did have the power to curtail faculty senate influence over economic issues and that unions had the potential to share jurisdiction with senates in a number of key areas such as personnel decision making (Baldridge and Kemerer 1976).…”
Section: Academic Collective Bargaining and Faculty Governance: A Historical Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In most instances, administrators at institutions of higher education accept unions only if forced to by law. Prior to the Yeshiva decision, unionization at colleges and universities around the country rose steadily (Garbarino 1980). However, mainly as a result of that case, this trend was significantly braked in the subsequent decades, with growth occurring mostly in public colleges and universities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%