2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-006-0036-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faculty Perspectives on Moving from Blackboard to the Moodle Learning Management System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
56
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…For students, LMS has improved their online communication with the instructors by motivating them to play an active role in the learning process, rather than playing a passive role of receiving information through traditional methods, such as instructors and textbooks (Liaw, 2008;Tella, 2011). According to Beatty and Connie (2006), Blackboard is one of the leading commercial learning management systems LMS software packages used by North American and European universities. This learning system is a software application to facilitate teaching and learning.…”
Section: An Overview Of Blackboard Learning Management System (Lms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For students, LMS has improved their online communication with the instructors by motivating them to play an active role in the learning process, rather than playing a passive role of receiving information through traditional methods, such as instructors and textbooks (Liaw, 2008;Tella, 2011). According to Beatty and Connie (2006), Blackboard is one of the leading commercial learning management systems LMS software packages used by North American and European universities. This learning system is a software application to facilitate teaching and learning.…”
Section: An Overview Of Blackboard Learning Management System (Lms)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transition from commercial LMS to open-source systems (such as Moodle) is a growing trend. The spread of these online technologies has been widely analyzed at faculty level, as for example in San Francisco State University (SFSU), where the 70% of all courses use online technologies (Beatty & Ulasewicz, 2006). Moodle platforms are under continuous evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Beatty and Ulasewicz (2006), three primary institutional perceptions for LMS adoption are 1. The nature of LMSs implies a vehicle for increasing the efficiency of teaching.…”
Section: Supporting Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most importantly, the consideration of LMS migration must include instructional design (instructor support services) and faculty advisory committees along with student input since instructors and students are ultimately the final arbiters of LMS effectiveness (Beatty & Ulasewicz, 2006). There will arise, of course, faculty concerns and issues from an LMS change, including concerns about time demands and associated compensation, the possibility of instructor re-training, course re-design, assurances of knowledgeable support, copyright issues, communication issues, and a multitude of other concerns that could impact faculty and students attitudes and, therefore, the ultimate success of an LMS migration Harrington et al, 2006;Kremers & Dissel, 2000;Smart & Meyer, 2005;Ryan et al, 2012;Turner, 2011).…”
Section: Issues With Lms Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%