2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.nedt.2010.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faculty perceptions of interprofessional education

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
47
0
6

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
5
47
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…54,[56][57][58][59][60] Also, IPE efforts designed around classroom exposure or experiences were generally found to not have significant impacts on measurable or meaningful outcomes, such as professional behavior or communication, and more than a few studies found that attitudes and perceptions amongst the various professional bodies (of students) and faculty represented actually became worse in that power barriers and stereotypes were reinforced. 54,61,62 Given that the intended and speculated outcomes for IPE are still unclear and largely unsubstantiated, 60,63 that a working definition or understanding of interprofessional competency is still being debated by many in the field, 60 that significant human and material resources are significant needs for an IPE curriculum, 58 that clinical/experiential-based efforts are required to achieve short-lived, but positive change, 55 and that AT policymakers have yet to articulate an actual and definable or measurable professional outcome for an IPE initiative, 52,53 it would appear that an evidence-informed platform for IPE is not yet available for AT educators or policymakers to rely upon (at least not a clear roadmap).…”
Section: What Does the Evidence Say About Ipe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…54,[56][57][58][59][60] Also, IPE efforts designed around classroom exposure or experiences were generally found to not have significant impacts on measurable or meaningful outcomes, such as professional behavior or communication, and more than a few studies found that attitudes and perceptions amongst the various professional bodies (of students) and faculty represented actually became worse in that power barriers and stereotypes were reinforced. 54,61,62 Given that the intended and speculated outcomes for IPE are still unclear and largely unsubstantiated, 60,63 that a working definition or understanding of interprofessional competency is still being debated by many in the field, 60 that significant human and material resources are significant needs for an IPE curriculum, 58 that clinical/experiential-based efforts are required to achieve short-lived, but positive change, 55 and that AT policymakers have yet to articulate an actual and definable or measurable professional outcome for an IPE initiative, 52,53 it would appear that an evidence-informed platform for IPE is not yet available for AT educators or policymakers to rely upon (at least not a clear roadmap).…”
Section: What Does the Evidence Say About Ipe?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bennett, Gum, Lindeman, and Lawn (2011) reported that "leadership and commitment at the executive level were fundamental to IPE success" (p. 573). Laissez-faire attitudes of senior executives and deans illustrate a lack of organizational commitment.…”
Section: Challenges Of Interprofessional Health Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many respondents participating in research on IPE have valued experiences which have taken place in clinical, real-time settings (Gilligan et al, 2014;Bennett et al, 2011) and which are 'authentic and occurred in environments that valued patient quality and safety over hierarchy' (Loversidge & Demb 2015, p303). Hammick et al (2007), in particular, identified this as a key message of an earlier best-evidence systematic review of IPE:…”
Section: Ipe and The Use Of High Fidelity Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%