Faculty mentors for interaction over four years

Payer, Andrew F.; Ainsworth, Michael; Brower, C. H.

doi:10.1097/00001888-199605000-00033

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The mentor's impact upon the mentoring process was evaluated using selfreported changes in practice and the mentee's perception of the mentor's abilities. 10 studies [36,80,83,86,88,89,98,108,117,118] assessed the roles of the mentor from the mentee and mentor's perspective while five studies [36,81,88,91,119] asked the mentors about their experiences as a mentor.…”

Section: Domains Assessedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Assessing mentoring: A scoping review of mentoring assessment tools in internal medicine between 1990 and 2019

Koh

Yap

et al. 2020

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Mentoring's success in enhancing a mentee's professional and personal development, and a host organisations' reputation has been called into question, amidst a lack of effective tools to evaluate mentoring relationships and guide oversight of mentoring programs. A scoping review is proposed to map available literature on mentoring assessment tools in Internal Medicine to guide design of new tools. Objective The review aims to explore how novice mentoring is assessed in Internal Medicine, including the domains assessed, and the strengths and limitations of the assessment methods. Methods Guided by Levac et al.'s framework for scoping reviews, 12 reviewers conducted independent literature reviews of assessment tools in novice mentoring in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ERIC, Cochrane, GreyLit, Web of Science, Open Dissertations and British Education Index databases. A 'split approach' saw research members adopting either Braun and Clarke's approach to thematic analysis or directed content analysis to independently evaluate the data and improve validity and objectivity of the findings.

show abstract