2009
DOI: 10.1080/15332900902979119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faculty-Librarian Collaboration for Library Services in the Online Classroom: Student Evaluation Results and Recommended Practices for Implementation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The findings are supported by Coomarasamy and Khan (2004) and Sundin (2003), who found that integrated teaching produced better learning outcomes, because the students could identify real clinical problems. They also had a greater number of reflections (Cobus, 2009;Figa et al, 2009). Kolstad (2015) found that the supervisors had different roles depending on the students' questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The findings are supported by Coomarasamy and Khan (2004) and Sundin (2003), who found that integrated teaching produced better learning outcomes, because the students could identify real clinical problems. They also had a greater number of reflections (Cobus, 2009;Figa et al, 2009). Kolstad (2015) found that the supervisors had different roles depending on the students' questions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have investigated face-to-face supervision, or only online-supervision and hybrid learning management systems (Cobus, 2009;Figa, Bone, & Macpherson, 2009;Florea, 2008;Kraemer, Lombardo, & Lepkowski, 2007). Florea (2008) presents an overview of studies that have investigated different tools from the supervisor's point of view.…”
Section: A Literature Review Of Students' Il Learning In Work Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a result, students need solutions for off-site flexible access to scholarly publications, as well as technologically supportive environments for their group collaborations. 9,10,11,12 …”
Section: Patrons: the Academic Community Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%