Faculty appointment and tenure policies in medical schools

Abstract

The authors present recent data on changes under way in and the current status of faculty appointment and tenure policies in U.S. medical schools. The data are drawn from a survey conducted by the Association of American Medical Colleges in 1997, to which deans at all 125 U.S. allopathic medical schools responded, supplemented by follow-up telephone and electronic mail inquiries. Faculty evaluation systems and faculty compensation systems top the list of areas in which medical schools are most frequently making policy changes, with approximately half of the schools involved in each area. Changes in evaluation systems reflect an increasing emphasis on post-tenure review. Changes in compensation systems are characterized by the division of pay into separate components, each with its own financial guarantees and with the level of compensation tied specifically to measures of individual and group productivity. Other policy changes include introducing new faculty tracks and career pathways, redefining or clarifying the portion of salary or compensation that is defined by tenure, lengthening the pre-tenure probationary period, and modifying the link between promotion and tenure. Of the 125 medical schools in the United States, only five do not award tenure, while another six effectively limit eligibility for tenure to basic science faculty. These numbers are unchanged from those reported in 1994. Only two schools indicated that eliminating tenure or ceasing to make tenure-eligible appointments was being considered, and neither reported that a policy change was imminent. Current data on the status of tenure guarantees, tenure probationary periods, other tenure eligibility criteria, and special clinical tracks are provided. Nearly three fourths of the medical schools in the United States now have a separate and distinct faculty track for full-time clinical faculty whose primary responsibilities are in patient care and teaching. The vast majority of these tracks do not permit faculty to be tenured, but 71% require evidence of scholarship for promotion. The authors conclude that faculty personnel policies in medical schools are likely to continue to evolve, consistent with a growing insinuation of the corporate culture into academia.

A National Faculty Development Needs Assessment in Emergency Medicine

“…1 The traditional "clinician-educator" role, 2,3 both in the classroom and in clinical settings, is still a significant component of an academic physician's career [4][5][6] . However, many administrative, research, scholarly, and advocacy-related roles are increasingly identified as important-if not mandatory-facets to an academic position in emergency medicine.…”

Mentoring and coaching in promoting publications in the Department of Physiotherapy at a local university in South Africa

“…Emden (1998) highlighted that publishing in peer reviewed journals is an instrumental component in succeeding as a researcher. Productivity at this level will not only assist the academic with career advancement (Jones & Gold, 1998) but will also improve the standing of the department within the university and discipline (Baldwin & Chandler, 2002). This form of scholarly activity highlights the need to be open to, and accept constructive criticism or feedback through the process of peer review.…”

Medical student indebtedness and the propensity to enter academic medicine

“…[14] that financial pressures are causing medical schools to attempt to limit tenure, although it is unlikely to completely disappear. Indeed, Jones and Gold [15] note that only five of the 125 US medical schools fail to award tenure. (Six schools limit tenure to basic science faculty.)…”