Factors underlying surrogate medical decision-making in middle eastern and east Asian women: a Q-methodology study

Abstract

Background: It is not clear how lay people prioritize the various, sometimes conflicting, interests when they make surrogate medical decisions, especially in non-Western cultures. The extent such decisions are perspective-related is also not well documented. Methods: We explored the relative importance of 28 surrogate decision-making factors to 120 Middle-Eastern (ME) and 120 East-Asian (EA) women from three perspectives, norm-perception (N), preference as patient (P), and preference as surrogate decision-maker (S). Each respondent force-ranked (one to nine) 28 opinion-items according to each perspective. Items' ranks were analyzed by averaging-analysis and Q-methodology. Results: Respondents' mean (SD) age was 33.2 (7.9) years; all ME were Muslims, 83% of EA were Christians. "Trying everything possible to save patient," "Improving patient health," "Patient pain and suffering," and/or "What is in the best interests of patient" were the three most-important items, whereas "Effect of caring for patient on all patients in society," "Effect of caring for patient on patients with same disease," and/or "Cost to society from caring for patient" were among the three least-important items, in each ME and EA perspectives. P-perspective assigned higher mean ranks to family and surrogate's needs and burdens-related items, and lower mean rank to "Fear of loss" than S-perspective (p<0.001). ME assigned higher mean ranks to "Medical facts" and "Surrogate own wishes for patient" and lower mean rank to "Family needs" in all perspectives (p<0.001). Q-methodology identified models that were relatively patient's preference-, patient's religious/spiritual beliefs-, or emotion-dependent (all perspectives); medical facts-dependent (N-and S-perspectives), financial needs-dependent (P-and S-perspectives), and family needs-dependent (P-perspective). Conclusions: 1) Patient's health was more important than patient's preference to ME and EA women; society interest was least important. 2) Family and surrogate's needs/ burdens were more important, whereas fear of loss was less important to respondents as patients than as surrogate decision-makers. 3) Family needs were more important to EA than ME respondents, the opposite was true for medical facts and surrogate's wishes for patient. 4) Q-methodology models that relatively emphasized various surrogate decision-making factors overlapped the ME and EA women' three perspectives.

Myths and Common Misbeliefs About Colorectal Cancer Causation in Palestine: A National Cross-Sectional Study

“… 6 , 51 Families are often the main carers for patients diagnosed with cancer in the Middle East and also take responsibility for treatment, 6 compared with Western countries, where care and treatment choices are more strongly dependent on patient preferences and where hospices or nursing homes are more acceptable and available. 52 One study in Taiwan showed that older Taiwanese residents at long-term care institutions believe firmly that they must contact their families before making any decisions connected to end-of-life care, in contrast to older Europeans and Americans, 53 , 54 while another study showed that family members participated in decision making in <50% of all non-Hispanic White patients with cancer, with percentages being higher for Asian Americans and Spanish-speaking Latinos. 55 Therefore, while raising awareness of different cancers, there should be more consideration of the impact that family members and friends have on lifestyle choices and behaviors.…”

Experiences of Family Caregivers’ Involvement in Treatment Related- Decision-Making in Triadic Health Encounters

“…But the patients still preferred the shared family decision making model. (AlHaqwi et al, 2015;Hammami et al, 2020) Family caregivers' behaviours during D.M process may be seen as a continuum from a passive to an active attitude. Most of the patients, FCs and physicians prefer the FCs to be involved in treatment decision-making (Dionne-Odom et al, 2019;Lamore et al, 2017).…”