2006
DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzl014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors that influence cancer patients’ overall perceptions of the quality of care

Abstract: From a practical perspective, improvement efforts are best focused on factors that are strong predictors as well as on those for which there is a low score. Thus, on the basis of this study, practitioners' improvement efforts might be constructively focused on the four predictors mentioned above.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
91
2
3

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
6
91
2
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The literature appears contradictory regarding the possible effects of stage of disease on the patients' assessments of care. 6,7,37 The scores on the indicator regarding mediastinoscopy performed according to guideline criteria is a good example of the finding that a low score on an indicator does not automatically mean that there is a problem in the quality of care, but rather is a signal to further evaluate the matter. There can either be new evidence that demands a change in recommen-dations, or care should be improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The literature appears contradictory regarding the possible effects of stage of disease on the patients' assessments of care. 6,7,37 The scores on the indicator regarding mediastinoscopy performed according to guideline criteria is a good example of the finding that a low score on an indicator does not automatically mean that there is a problem in the quality of care, but rather is a signal to further evaluate the matter. There can either be new evidence that demands a change in recommen-dations, or care should be improved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 This inefficiency also affects patients, who often experience long wait times for appointments with their oncologists, reducing their satisfaction, [2][3][4][5][6] increasing their distress, 7 and increasing patient and caregiver costs. [8][9] There is also evidence that long wait times may also directly and indirectly reduce patient adherence to recommended treatment.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3,6,[16][17][18][19][20] Time-focused research has consistently demonstrated that wait time significantly influences the emotional turmoil and health outcomes of patients with cancer. 3 An investigation of the patient perceptions of oncology outpatient clinics assessed 252 patients' perceptions of factors that influenced patient satisfaction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important argument for health care organizations to increase patient satisfaction is the belief that satisfied patients are more likely to cooperate with their treatment, continue their use of medical services, and maintain a good relationship with their physicians. Greater patient satisfaction is associated with better clinical outcomes [2][3][4][5][6][7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%