Abstract:Purpose
This study aims to investigate the factors determining the readiness for uptake of open data (OD) in Tanzania. Specifically, this study intended to answer the question that sought to find out the factors that influence the implementation of OD in universities under study in a view to aligning with recommended strategies for optimizing the use of data in the open science era.
Design/methodology/approach
This study used a cross-sectional survey design whereby data were collected using quantitative and … Show more
“…OS is a relatively new avenue in the research landscape of Tanzania, with reported practices placing a heavy focus on open access (OA) (Dulle et al 2010;Mgonzo & Yonah 2014;Buhomoli & Muneja 2022). OS adoption in Tanzania has been slow despite several initiatives geared towards promoting the movement (Muneja & Ndenje-Sichalwe 2016;Kaijage 2017;Siyao et al 2017;Fossner 2021;Personal communication 2022;TCC Africa 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slow trend may be due to low awareness of the OS practices among research and academic institutions. Misconceptions and concerns for misuse of data such as loss of patent rights, data theft and manipulation in open repositories may hold back researchers from practising OS (Buhomoli & Muneja 2022). Elsewhere in Africa, a lack of clear institutional policies to guide application of OS principles has also been a hindrance and may be the case for Tanzania as well (Mwelwa et al 2020;Okafor et al 2022).…”
The Open Science (OS) movement has been spreading rapidly among researchers with positive outcomes on accessibility of scientific knowledge. However, there is no clear evidence on the level of awareness and types of OS practices among scholars and researchers in Tanzania, potentially missing an opportunity to reap the rewards of the movement to scholarly pursuits. This study investigated the level of awareness of OS and practices among Tanzanian scholars and researchers. Findings of a digital survey conducted for three months and recruited 144 respondents, show a high level of awareness of the term OS for 84% of respondents, most of them having encountered it from peers or online sources including social media. About 69% of respondents were male while about 44% of respondents were early career professionals. Open access (OA) publishing was the most common OS activity practised by respondents, highlighting both the need to create awareness on other practices and an entry point for knowledge expansion. However, respondents highlighted the barriers to spreading of the OS movement in the country including lack of awareness, knowledge and skills, the lack of institutional support and concerns over data security and ownership. Findings of this study establish OA as the most common and important OS practice among Tanzanian scholars. They show the importance of online resources and peers to peer learning and in spreading OS awareness. The study also reveals several areas of advocacy and including setting supportive institutional policies and building infrastructure to support OS practices. We recomment establisment of robust guidelines, institutional support and clear opportunities to incentivize individuals to adopt OS practices ao as to achieve the momentum required to scale the movement beyond OA.
“…OS is a relatively new avenue in the research landscape of Tanzania, with reported practices placing a heavy focus on open access (OA) (Dulle et al 2010;Mgonzo & Yonah 2014;Buhomoli & Muneja 2022). OS adoption in Tanzania has been slow despite several initiatives geared towards promoting the movement (Muneja & Ndenje-Sichalwe 2016;Kaijage 2017;Siyao et al 2017;Fossner 2021;Personal communication 2022;TCC Africa 2022).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The slow trend may be due to low awareness of the OS practices among research and academic institutions. Misconceptions and concerns for misuse of data such as loss of patent rights, data theft and manipulation in open repositories may hold back researchers from practising OS (Buhomoli & Muneja 2022). Elsewhere in Africa, a lack of clear institutional policies to guide application of OS principles has also been a hindrance and may be the case for Tanzania as well (Mwelwa et al 2020;Okafor et al 2022).…”
The Open Science (OS) movement has been spreading rapidly among researchers with positive outcomes on accessibility of scientific knowledge. However, there is no clear evidence on the level of awareness and types of OS practices among scholars and researchers in Tanzania, potentially missing an opportunity to reap the rewards of the movement to scholarly pursuits. This study investigated the level of awareness of OS and practices among Tanzanian scholars and researchers. Findings of a digital survey conducted for three months and recruited 144 respondents, show a high level of awareness of the term OS for 84% of respondents, most of them having encountered it from peers or online sources including social media. About 69% of respondents were male while about 44% of respondents were early career professionals. Open access (OA) publishing was the most common OS activity practised by respondents, highlighting both the need to create awareness on other practices and an entry point for knowledge expansion. However, respondents highlighted the barriers to spreading of the OS movement in the country including lack of awareness, knowledge and skills, the lack of institutional support and concerns over data security and ownership. Findings of this study establish OA as the most common and important OS practice among Tanzanian scholars. They show the importance of online resources and peers to peer learning and in spreading OS awareness. The study also reveals several areas of advocacy and including setting supportive institutional policies and building infrastructure to support OS practices. We recomment establisment of robust guidelines, institutional support and clear opportunities to incentivize individuals to adopt OS practices ao as to achieve the momentum required to scale the movement beyond OA.
“…Additionally, Matonkar and Dhuri (2021) investigated how open education and free Internet resources were used in India during the Covid-19 pandemic and discovered that the vast majority of participants were unfamiliar with OER. Further, a study by Buhomoli and Muneja (2022) shows that researchers and decisionmakers have little or no awareness of issues connected to open science, such as open data and OERs. Appiah et al, (2020) conducted a study at Ghana's Kumasi Technical University on an evocative appraisal of OER awareness, attitude, and utilization.…”
This study explored university lecturers 'feelings, awareness, and attitudes toward Open Education Resources (OERs). The study focused on two higher learning institutions based in Tanzania. It was conducted through a quantitative approach. Data were collected using a questionnaire from 52 lecturers who were purposively selected. The collected data were subjected to Statistical Product and Service Solutions version 20 computer program for calculation of descriptive Statistics. A descriptive analysis was used to analyze the obtained data, which were then presented in frequencies and percentages in tables. Findings indicate that the sampled lecturers from the higher learning institutions are moderately aware of the OERs. Regarding the feelings of lecturers over the use of OER, the collected data have revealed that a majority of the lecturers believed in OERs, are happy for those who adopt their OERs, and that they feel that OERs enhance the reputation of their institutions. In terms of lecturers' attitudes toward OERs, a majority of the lecturers strongly agreed that OERs are more beneficial to the academic and research communities. The study concludes that a majority of the study participants are moderately aware of the OERs and believe in them and that they are pleased when people adopt their OERs. The study suggests that there should be training and supporting lecturers who have unfavorable sentiments towards OERs so that they can change and use the program for their academic and research activities and advancement.
“…Other institutions joined the initiative by developing the IRs, such as Mzumbe University IR (MU IR), Sokoine University of Agriculture IR (SUA IR), Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences IR (MUHAS IR), and the University of Dodoma IR (UDOM IR) (Muneja, 2009;Nunda & Elia, 2018). The IR adoption and use in Tanzania have been motivated by several aspects, such as increasing institutional visibility, research outputs, and citation impacts (Buhomoli & Muneja, 2023;Mbughuni et al, 2022;Nunda & Elia, 2018).…”
Institutional Repositories (IRs) development in Tanzania has made publications readily available, accessible, and retrievable. IRs have increased the visibility of researchers and institutions and have contributed to the University ranking. Several Higher Learning Institutions (HLIs) in Tanzania have developed their IRs hosting institutional publications. This study assessed the citation impact of IR contents of selected Tanzanian HLIs. The study evaluated the citation impact of IR contents using publications indexed in the Scopus database. Four HLIs were purposively selected. The search within reference advanced feature for the Scopus database was conducted. The publications indexed in Scopus citing the selected IR contents from 2018 to 2022 were identified and extracted. Data analysis was carried out using Microsoft Excel and SPSS. The study findings indicated that the Tanzanian IR contents had a low citation impact. The study recommends that Tanzanian HLIs devise strategies for increasing IR content visibility. The strategies may include registering the IRs in online platforms and ensuring the Handle System is implemented to improve the accessibility of the IR content. Furthermore, the HLIs should create awareness of research visibility, enabling researchers to publish and increase their visibility.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.