1994
DOI: 10.1016/0166-6851(94)90119-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors that bind to RNA polymerase I promoter sequences of Trypanosoma brucei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

1994
1994
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results confirm that, for the hybrid rRNA-PARP promoters, the initiation sites were similar or identical to those used by the species providing the start site. Preliminary results indicate that the same is true for hybrid PARP-rRNA promoters (18). These results are therefore consistent with transcription of PARP, rRNA, and hybrid promoters by the same polymerase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results confirm that, for the hybrid rRNA-PARP promoters, the initiation sites were similar or identical to those used by the species providing the start site. Preliminary results indicate that the same is true for hybrid PARP-rRNA promoters (18). These results are therefore consistent with transcription of PARP, rRNA, and hybrid promoters by the same polymerase.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 77%
“…From this evidence, one might expect the PARP and rRNA promoters to compete for transcription factors. We have been unable to confirm this by gel mobility shift analysis (19), and it is unlikely to be possible to test by transient transfection because the system is not easily saturated (48 (14,39). RNA polymerase II transcription also appears inefficient in comparison with transcription by RNA polymerase I: a single neomycin phosphotransferase gene integrated at the rRNA locus gave 5-to 10-fold more RNA than an analogous construct integrated in the tubulin array (35), and integrated luciferase genes show a similar difference in expression (41b).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In this respect, our results contradict those of Janz et al (17) with the procyclin promoter, perhaps because of the use of different experimental conditions. In striking contrast, a specific binding was clearly observed when nuclear extracts were incubated with a singlestranded probe, namely, the noncoding strand of box 2.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 57%
“…We present here such an analysis. This should be compared with similar analyses of the procyclin promoter, already presented by different groups (5,6,16,17,28).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, despite a lack of homology, one of these stretches appears to bind common factors (192). Interestingly, the binding of specific proteins requires that the target DNA be single-stranded (29,192), and the binding of proteins common to the three promoters is not observed on doublestranded DNA (87,192). These results suggest that these promoters should be partially denatured to be functional (29,192).…”
Section: Unusual Transcription Promotersmentioning
confidence: 99%