1968
DOI: 10.1152/jn.1968.31.4.624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors responsible for multiple discharge of neurons in Clarke's column.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
48
0

Year Published

1972
1972
1995
1995

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(56 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
6
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5A). Small random EPSPs (known to occur in DSCT cells; see Kuno & Miyahara, 1968) decline were similar. This observation, repeated in five other DSCT neurons, suggests that group I afferents could be responsible for the contraction-induced inhibitory potentials in DSCT neurons and that contribution of group II afferents to inhibitory potentials was negligible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…5A). Small random EPSPs (known to occur in DSCT cells; see Kuno & Miyahara, 1968) decline were similar. This observation, repeated in five other DSCT neurons, suggests that group I afferents could be responsible for the contraction-induced inhibitory potentials in DSCT neurons and that contribution of group II afferents to inhibitory potentials was negligible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 77%
“…One example is provided by the branches of Ia afferent fibres which have characteristically different effects at two different synapses. One branch causes a large, powerful, excitatory potential in the neurones of Clarke's column while another evokes only a small subthreshold potential in spinal motoneurones (Kuno & Miyahara, 1968). It is not yet known how these synapses behave with trains of impulses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maximum electrical stimuli applied to such monosynaptic paths often produce large excitatory post-synaptic potentials (e.p.s.p.s) in DSCT neurones which range up to 30-65 mV in amplitude (Kuno & Miyahara, 1968; Eide, Fedina, Jansen, Lundberg & Vyklick', 1969a). This contrasts with synaptic action on spinal motoneurones in which the maximum monosynaptic e.p.s.p.s rarely exceed 12 mV (Eccles, Eccles & Lundberg, 1957).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%