“…This lack of empirical evaluation is especially surprising given the continued widespread use of the scale across the disciplines of personality and social psychology (e.g., Kogut, 2011;Laurin, Fitzsimons, & Kay, 2011), counseling psychology (e.g., Parikh, Ceballos, & Post, 2013), abnormal psychology (e.g., Nudelman & Shiloh, 2011), education (e.g., Morais & Ogden, 2011), social justice (e.g., Torres-Harding, Steele, Schulz, Taha, & Pico, 2014, law (e.g., Hill, 2009), and marketing (e.g., White, Rhiannon, & Ellard, 2012). In general, the GBJWS has been used extensively across the social sciences since its construction, yet has been subject to relatively little evaluation save for the occasional praise (e.g., Couch, 1998) as a promising alternative to other scales.…”