2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.watres.2012.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors related to occurrence and distribution of selected bacterial and protozoan pathogens in Pennsylvania streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
(70 reference statements)
4
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ability of the indicator data string to predict the presence or absence of a pathogen is expressed as the percentage of samples correctly classified into ''pathogen present'' and ''pathogen absent'' categories (Harwood et al, 2005). An additional measure of accuracy for the Type I relationship was the percentage of cases when the indicator was absent and the pathogen present (Duris et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The ability of the indicator data string to predict the presence or absence of a pathogen is expressed as the percentage of samples correctly classified into ''pathogen present'' and ''pathogen absent'' categories (Harwood et al, 2005). An additional measure of accuracy for the Type I relationship was the percentage of cases when the indicator was absent and the pathogen present (Duris et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A linear combination of indicator concentrations that would give the best separation of samples into groups with and without a pathogen was also sought. The water quality criteria value for E. coli was tested as a threshold to estimate pathogen prevalence in samples above and below it (Duris et al, 2013).…”
Section: The Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations