Factors promoting emotional‐behavioural resilience and adjustment in children exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review

Fogarty, Alison; Wood, Catherine; Giallo, Rebecca; Kaufman, Jordy; Hansen, Michelle Kay

doi:10.1111/ajpy.12242

Cited by 41 publications

(42 citation statements)

References 45 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Initially, a search of the Cochrane Database, Campbell Collaboration, University of York (DARE Database) and Prospero databases was conducted to locate previous or current relevant reviews. Three relevant reviews from the UK, which differed significantly to our own, were located on the Prospero database (Arai et al, 2016; Fogarty, Wood, & Hanson, 2016; Moore, Howarth, Feder, & Heawood, 2013). ETHOS, PROQUEST Dissertations and Thesis Global was also searched to uncover any relevant thesis or dissertations.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Nature and Extent of Qualitative Research Conducted With Children About Their Experiences of Domestic Violence: Findings From a Meta-Synthesis

Noble‐Carr

Moore

McArthur

2019

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Domestic violence is a significant issue experienced by many children that can have a detrimental impact on their health, development, and well-being. This article reports on the findings of a meta-synthesis that examined the nature and extent of qualitative studies conducted with children about their experience of domestic violence. Studies were identified by a search of electronic databases and included gray literature. Studies were included for review if they were published between 1996 and 2016, were from countries considered as comparable Western nations to Australia and available in the English language, and reported on qualitative studies that directly engaged with children under the age of 18 years on their experiences of intimate partner violence involving one or more of their parents/carers. Forty peer-reviewed publications that reported on 32 studies were included for the review. This study was unique in that it included child participation measures to assess the quality of available studies. This article explores the contribution that research with children has made to our understandings of, and responses to, domestic violence, and provides a critique of the limitations and gaps evident in the extant qualitative research with children on the issue of domestic violence. The article considers implications for future research, policy, and practice and in particular focuses our attention on the need to engage more children more fully in participatory research in the field of domestic violence.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Nature and Extent of Qualitative Research Conducted With Children About Their Experiences of Domestic Violence: Findings From a Meta-Synthesis

Noble‐Carr

Moore

McArthur

2019

Trauma, Violence, & Abuse

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Another potential interpretation is that parental acceptance plays a buffering role between family conflict and child internalizing problems (Fogarty, Wood, Giallo, Kaufman, & Hansen, 2019;Graham-Bermann, Gruber, Howell, & Girz, 2009). The correlations among model coefficients showed that family conflict explained less variation of child internalizing psychopathology in families/children reporting greater parental acceptance (r family = 0.41; rchild = 0.39; both p < .001; see Supplementary Materials).…”

Section: (H1••) Consistent Between-family and (H2••) Between-child Differences Our Findingsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Family Processes and Child Psychopathology: A Between- and Within-Family/Child Analysis

Lin

Schleider

Eaton

2021

Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Funding. There is no funding to report for the present work. Conflicts of interest/Competing interests. There is no conflict of interests to report for the present work. Availability of data and material. The current study is based on a de-identified open datasetthe Adolescent Brain and Cognitive Development (ABCD) Study. The usage did not require IRB approval. See: https://nda.nih.gov/abcd. Ethics approval: ABCD research sites obtained ethical approvals through a central Institutional Review Board (cIRB) at the University of California, San Diego, except that the site at Washington University in St. Louis utilized their local IRB approval. NIH-recognized research institutions can access the de-identified ABCD data with federal-wide assurance. According to the IRB of Stony Brook University, the current use of the ABCD data for secondary analysis is exempt from IRB review. Consent to participate: Informed consent and assent of parents and children were obtained before the baseline assessment. Consent for publication: Informed consent and assent of parents and children were obtained before the baseline assessment. NIH-recognized research institutions can access the de-identified ABCD data with federal-wide assurance. Code availability. The current analyses were conducted based on open-source R packages.

show abstract

“…However, not all children exposed to DV experience these negative consequences. Indeed, many children demonstrate high levels of resilience following CEDV with consequences varying based on the magnitude and frequency of exposure, the child's developmental stage, gender, race/ethnicity, and personal and environmental protective factors (Anderson & Danis, 2006;Cameranesi et al, 2020;Fogarty et al, 2019). For instance, a recent study identified a set of personal and environmental protective factors among youth exposed to DV and under child maltreatment investigation (Mariscal, 2020).…”

Section: Substantiation Thresholds and Maltreatment Typesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Child Protective Services Guidelines for Substantiating Exposure to Domestic Violence as Maltreatment and Assigning Caregiver Responsibility: Policy Analysis and Recommendations

et al. 2021

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The purpose of this study was to examine the range of policy approaches used by child welfare systems in the United States to guide workers in classifying and substantiating child exposure to domestic violence (CEDV) as an actionable form of maltreatment. To that end, we conducted a qualitative document analysis of child protective services (CPS) policy manuals from all state-administered child welfare systems in the U.S. ( N = 41). Our findings indicate that a majority of state-administered systems (71%) have adopted policy requiring workers to demonstrate that children have endured harm or the threat of harm before substantiating CEDV-related maltreatment. Many state systems (51%) also include policy directives that require workers to identify a primary aggressor during CPS investigations involving CEDV, while far fewer (37%) provide language that potentially exonerates survivors of domestic violence from being held accountable for failure to protect on the basis of their own victimization. Based on our findings and identification of policy exemplars, we offer a recommended set of quality policy indicators for states to consider in the formulation of their policy guidelines for substantiating children’s exposure to domestic violence that promotes the safety and wellbeing of both children and adult survivors of domestic violence.

show abstract

Factors promoting emotional‐behavioural resilience and adjustment in children exposed to intimate partner violence: A systematic review

Cited by 41 publications

References 45 publications

The Nature and Extent of Qualitative Research Conducted With Children About Their Experiences of Domestic Violence: Findings From a Meta-Synthesis

The Nature and Extent of Qualitative Research Conducted With Children About Their Experiences of Domestic Violence: Findings From a Meta-Synthesis

Family Processes and Child Psychopathology: A Between- and Within-Family/Child Analysis

Child Protective Services Guidelines for Substantiating Exposure to Domestic Violence as Maltreatment and Assigning Caregiver Responsibility: Policy Analysis and Recommendations

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About