1988
DOI: 10.1002/hed.2890100806
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors predictive of success or failure in acquisition of esophageal speech

Abstract: This article discusses negative and positive predictors for acquiring esophageal speech. These indicators are grouped under two broad categories: anatomidphysiologic and psychological/ social. The success and failure rates and advantages and disadvantages of esophageal speech are also presented. Consideration of all factors will enable professionals to counsel patients realistically about their potential for successful acquisition of this method of alaryngeal speech. HEAD & NECK SURGERY 10:S105-S109,1988T h e … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…32 per cent myotomy rate). This figure would explain the fact that, on average, 64 per cent of laryngectomies develop satisfactory oesophageal voice (Salmon, 1988). The 36 per cent unable to develop oesophageal voice may well have an unsuitable pharyngooesophageal segment and, if assessed by videofluoroscopy and air insufflation (Mclvor et al, 1990), may be shown to benefit from pharyngeal myotomy.…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…32 per cent myotomy rate). This figure would explain the fact that, on average, 64 per cent of laryngectomies develop satisfactory oesophageal voice (Salmon, 1988). The 36 per cent unable to develop oesophageal voice may well have an unsuitable pharyngooesophageal segment and, if assessed by videofluoroscopy and air insufflation (Mclvor et al, 1990), may be shown to benefit from pharyngeal myotomy.…”
Section: Agementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, the cornerstone of voice rehabilitation has been oesophageal voice. Reported success in acquisition of this varies from 24 per cent to 90 per cent of laryngectomies, with an average of 64 per cent (Salmon, 1988). In a very selected group of successful laryngectomy patients (Jay et al, 1991), 56 per cent felt they had acquired satisfactory oesophageal voice and 78 per cent of all the patients were satisfied with their voice rehabilitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The factors affecting the esophageal speech outcome may be different from each research study or individual cases. [13][14][15][16] For example, Keith et al 13 found that initial speech proficiency rating, educational level, and depression factors related to esophageal speech outcomes but Kresić et al 16 found that only patient's motivation factor affecting to esophageal speech outcome. Therefore, information about esophageal speech outcomes in alaryngeal patients will help speech pathologists to choose an appropriate speech rehabilitation method.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%