2022
DOI: 10.15240/tul/001/2022-4-002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors of Gender Pay Gap in the Highest Wages of Employees in the Slovak Republic

Abstract: The article contains the results of empirical analysis of data on one percent of employees with the highest salaries in the Slovak Republic in 2020. The starting point for the analysis there is 11,570 anonymized individual values of average gross monthly wage and also personal data of the employees whose wage exceeded the 99th percentile of the sample survey The Informational System on Labour Costs, implemented in the Slovak Republic since 1992 by the company Trexima Bratislava. The aim of the article is to as… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of observed and expected frequencies is a primary thought of the Chi-squared (χ 2 ), test of goodness of fit. The null hypothesis (H 0 )-between categorical variables A and B there is no dependence (there is no contingency) against an alternative hypothesis (H 1 ) -between categorical variables A and B there is dependence (there is contingency), we verify with a test characteristic, which is called square contingency [59]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of observed and expected frequencies is a primary thought of the Chi-squared (χ 2 ), test of goodness of fit. The null hypothesis (H 0 )-between categorical variables A and B there is no dependence (there is no contingency) against an alternative hypothesis (H 1 ) -between categorical variables A and B there is dependence (there is contingency), we verify with a test characteristic, which is called square contingency [59]:…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on the verification of the hypothesis, we proceeded to measure the intensity of this dependence. Pearson contingency coefficient was calculated on relationship [59]:…”
Section: Hypothesis 1 (H1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation