2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.theriogenology.2011.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors of a noninfectious nature affecting fertility after artificial insemination in lactating dairy cows. A review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

2
87
1
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(94 citation statements)
references
References 117 publications
2
87
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Heat stress is frequently cited as a risk factor for low conception rates in the cow (Lopez-Gatius, 2012). However, we did not identify any effect of the season of AI on FF-EEM and LEM.…”
contrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Heat stress is frequently cited as a risk factor for low conception rates in the cow (Lopez-Gatius, 2012). However, we did not identify any effect of the season of AI on FF-EEM and LEM.…”
contrasting
confidence: 85%
“…The year of observation effect observed in this survey might be due to the Bluetongue disease, which appeared in France in 2006 and re-emerged in 2007 and 2008. Both disease and vaccination have been recognised as factors decreasing fertility and increasing return rate after insemination in French dairy cattle (Nusinovici et al, 2011 and2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several authors have recently addressed potential relationships between normal oestrous cycles and the metabolic profile of cows during the breeding period (Wathes et al, 2007;López-Gatius, 2012). As detailed above, the metabolic profile of later postpartum cows (>30 days postpartum) still involves relatively low concentrations of glucose, insulin and IGF1 although concentrations of NEFA and BHBA have typically normalized.…”
Section: Itemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is therefore likely that controlled exposure to the infectious agent by vaccination protects susceptible seronegative animals from clinical symptoms or subclinical lesions and thus improves fertility. Possible positive effects of vaccination on subfertile cows after the first round of vaccination could be masked by primiparous cows which are more fertile than cows in their second or more parity (López-Gatius, 2012). The percentages of subfertile cows were 15.3% (58/378) and 22.7% (67/295) for the first and the second round of vaccination, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%