2018
DOI: 10.2176/nmc.oa.2017-0082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Leading to Improved Gait Function in Patients with Subacute or Chronic Central Nervous System Impairments Who Receive Functional Training with the Robot Suit Hybrid Assistive Limb

Abstract: The factors that lead to the improvement of gait function in patients with diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) who use a hybrid assistive limb (HAL) are not yet fully understood. The purpose of the present study was to analyze these factors to determine the prognosis of the patients’ gait function. Patients whose CNS disease was within 180 days since onset were designated as the subacute-phase patients, and patients whose disease onset had occurred more than 180 days previously were designated as chro… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Less relevant, Yoshimoto et al (2015) used the single leg version of the HAL robot suit (Kawamoto et al, 2009). Recently, it has been discussed how far single leg type is more suitable for patients with medium to low functional impairment and the double leg type is recommended for patients with severe functional impairment (indicated by FAC ≤ 1) (Nishimura et al, 2018). Studies investigating the efficiency of both types have not been performed yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Less relevant, Yoshimoto et al (2015) used the single leg version of the HAL robot suit (Kawamoto et al, 2009). Recently, it has been discussed how far single leg type is more suitable for patients with medium to low functional impairment and the double leg type is recommended for patients with severe functional impairment (indicated by FAC ≤ 1) (Nishimura et al, 2018). Studies investigating the efficiency of both types have not been performed yet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, as in our study the HAL group in their study received more therapy time in total. In contrast, other (single group) studies suggest that increase in walking speed [86] and improved independence in walking [90] after HAL training are less in patients with more severe hemiparesis (as assessed by Brunnström or FMA-LE) in the acute phase after stroke and in subacute stage after diseases in the central nervous system resulting in lower limb motor paresis. In Study II, patients had a FMA-LE motor score at T1 that were corresponding to a severe hemiparesis, yet improvements in independence in walking and walking speed were found, but without between-group differences.…”
Section: Objectively Assessed Clinical Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…At present, several studies have explored the use of HAL for gait training in different stages after stroke [77][78][79][80][81][82][84][85][86][87][88][89][90][91][92][93][94][95][96][97][98][99][100][101]. The studies differ in terms of aim, design, duration of intervention, diagnosis, setting, and patient characteristics as well as allocation, randomization, blinding and outcome measures.…”
Section: Hal For Gait Training After Strokementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation