“…As already mentioned above, the selection of socio-demographic data as interpretive variables of both behaviour and intention to recycle are based on previous researches, which conclude that social-demographic data are statistically significant interpretative factors (Seacat & Northup, 2010;Saphores et al, 2012;Fiorillo, 2013;Pakpour et al, 2014;Babaei et al, 2015;Crociata et al, 2015;Martinho et al, 2015;Triguero et al, 2016;Czajkowski et al, 2017;Echegaray & Hansstein, 2017;Lizin et al, 2017;Oztekin et al, 2017;Sidique et al, 2010;Saphores et al, 2012;Yau, 2012;Miafodzyeva & Brandt, 2013;Pakpour et al, 2014;Akil et al, 2015;Alpizar & Gsottbauer, 2015;Babaei et al, 2015;Martinho et al, 2015;Arbués & Villanúa, 2016;Choon et al, 2016;Noor, 2016;Zen et al, 2014;Babaei et al, 2015;Jafari et al, 2015;Martinho et al, 2015;Choon et al, 2016;Wang et al, 2016;Fielding et al, 2016). Accordingly, the selection of attitudes as an interpretive variable is based on a previous references that finds that it has a statistically significant effect on behavior and intent to recycle (Chen & Tung, 2010;Sidique et al, 2010;Best & Kneip, 2011;Bezzina & Dimech, 2011;Pakpour et al, 2014;Park & Ha, 2014;Wan et al, 2014a;…”