1IntroductionFor safety,l ong-term storage, and good performance, various tests must be performed when explosives are formulated with otherm aterials. Polymers in contact with explosives are used in an umber of ways, e.g. "plastic bonded" explosives, particulate encapsulation of explosives, or as swab materials and filters to collect explosivep articulates. Depending on applications, it is necessary to find polymers that adhere or repulse explosives;t he ability to achieve ab alanceb etweena ttraction and repulsion can also be desirable. In this work, atomic force microscopy (AFM) is used to assess explosive/polymer interactions.Typically,A FM generates topographic images of surface features from atomic to mms cale [1].H owever,A FM can also generate force curves betweenacantilever tip and sample surface [2][3][4][5][6].T hese force curves yield adhesive parametersf or the two test materials (i.e. tip and surface). By using the AFM cantilever and sample stage, an explosive particle affixed to the cantilever can be pressedo nto as amplem aterial, or,i nr everse, the sample material can be deposited onto the cantilever tip and pressed into am onolayero fe xplosive [7].P revious worko ne nergetic materials andA FM focused on adhesion to terminal groupfunctionalized self-assembled monolayers [8],a nd metal coupon finishes [9].In this study,a dhesion forces were obtained for nine energetic materials with eleven polymeric substrates (Section 3.1). The military explosives tested were 1,3,5-trinitroperhydro-1,3,5-triazine (RDX), octahydro-1,3,5,7-tetranitro-1,3,5,7-tetrazocine (HMX), pentaerythritol tetranitrate (PETN), and 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene (TNT). Also tested were energetic salts (potassium chlorate,p otassium perchlorate, and potassium nitrate), and energeticp eroxides (hexam-ethylene triperoxide diamine (HMTD)a nd triacetone triperoxide (TATP)).
2R esults and DiscussionQuantitativef orcem easurements were collected for av irgin tipped cantilevera nd polystyrene microsphere on Te flon, polyethylene (PE), polystyrene (PS), and polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) ( Table 1). Adhesion forcesc ould not be collected for at ipless cantileverw ith only glue because the overall adhesion was too great for the AFM to accurately measure. The adhesion forces for the virgin tipped cantilever were low with standard deviations no more than 60 %o f the observedv alues. The repeatability of these adhesion forces was likely due to the extremely well-characterized geometry and relatively small contact area of am anufactured AFM cantilever tip. Conversely,t he standardd eviation for adhesion forces was large for polystyrene microspheres. Thought he microsphere has well-characterized geometry (as confirmed via SEM), the lowere lastic modulus and increased contact area when compared to the silicon tip likely causedi ncreased overall measured adhesion [10].T he large microspherea dhesion forces suggest that if polymer substrate transferredt ot he energetic particle during as eries of force curves, the ensuing adhesion force on the Abstract:T he inte...