2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-47440-3_14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors Influencing the Sustainability of MOOCs Compared with Traditional Distance Education Courses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The benefits participants mentioned in the interviews included the flexibility and convenience of LMOOCs, echoing a study by Schulze and Scholz [76]. Flexibility is an important factor in the sustainability of an online course [77], and in this study, it involved "making it possible to observe others," "fitting learners' various personalities," and "allowing interactions with different learners," items that reflect the theory of social learning [33,34,78]. In contrast, convenience items such as "allowing retrieval of materials" and "helping learners learn and acquire knowledge" are advantages of computer-assisted learning (CAL).…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The benefits participants mentioned in the interviews included the flexibility and convenience of LMOOCs, echoing a study by Schulze and Scholz [76]. Flexibility is an important factor in the sustainability of an online course [77], and in this study, it involved "making it possible to observe others," "fitting learners' various personalities," and "allowing interactions with different learners," items that reflect the theory of social learning [33,34,78]. In contrast, convenience items such as "allowing retrieval of materials" and "helping learners learn and acquire knowledge" are advantages of computer-assisted learning (CAL).…”
Section: Discussion Limitations and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Flexibility and Scaffolding for Diversity (referring to the design where adaptive contents of MOOCs are provided for learners on different levels; advanced learners can select the difficult contents, while primary learners the easy ones.) in organizing MOOCs courses could strongly influence the sustainability of MOOCs (Hjeltnes & Horgen, 2016). We, therefore, proposed the following research hypothesis: H13.…”
Section: Social and Pedagogical Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Learner Retention in MOOCs was previously found under the influence of numerous factors: learner-tolearner interactions, instructor-to-learner interactions (Bernard et al, 2009), Course Content, Course Structure (Yang & Sun, 2018), Perceived Effectiveness (Yang & Sun, 2018), Instructor Support, Instructor Feedback (Barbera et al, 2017), Information Delivery (Fianu et al, 2018), Technology (Alyoussef, 2021), Quality Resources, The Focus of Subjects, Timing (Azevedo & Marques, 2017;Fianu et al, 2018), Flexibility and Scaffolding for Diversity (Hjeltnes & Horgen, 2016), and Pre-Course Information (Alraimi et al, 2015). Therefore, this study will concentrate on the above factors that may influence Learner Retention in MOOCs.…”
Section: Literature On Moocs During the Covid-19 Pandemicmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flexibility and Scaffolding for Diversity (referring to the design where adaptive contents of MOOC are provided for learners on different levels; advanced learners can select the di cult contents, while primary learners the easy ones.) in organizing MOOC courses could strongly in uence sustainability of MOOC (Hjeltnes, & Horgen, 2016). We, therefore, proposed the following research hypothesis: H13.…”
Section: H12 Timing (Tm) Is Signi Cantly Correlated With Lr In Moocmentioning
confidence: 99%