2006
DOI: 10.1080/00063650609461414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Factors influencing the small-scale distribution of House SparrowsPasser domesticusin a suburban environment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional research into the patterns of microhabitat use of House Sparrows in parks and gardens (e.g. Wilkinson 2006) and into the value of garden floras for invertebrate prey (e.g., Smith et al 2006) is needed. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Additional research into the patterns of microhabitat use of House Sparrows in parks and gardens (e.g. Wilkinson 2006) and into the value of garden floras for invertebrate prey (e.g., Smith et al 2006) is needed. …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, discrepancies with other studies could be a consequence of differences in landscape structure and in habitat quality. For example, House Sparrows in UK gardens and parks seem to be very dependent on bushes (Wilkinson 2006), but this is a substrate little used by sparrows in urban parks of Valencia (E Murgui, unpublished). Urban parks and derelict land are important habitats for House Sparrow populations in the urban landscape (e.g.…”
Section: Patterns In Habitat Selectionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Wooton et al (2002) found that nesting house sparrows were more likely to occur in older properties (built before 1919) and in medium-aged properties (20-60 years old) that had not had roof repairs, suggesting a link to nest site availability. Wilkinson (2006) found the probability of house sparrow occurrence in a suburban area to be positively related to bush cover and, in particular, to native species of bush, which may imply effects of food availability. Similarly, Heij (1985) suggested that the amount of green space was important in determining house sparrow density in urbanized environments but that there was also a correlation with building density, showing the importance of feeding and nesting sites in close proximity to each other.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…There is no evidence from this or other urban studies (Heij 1985, Heij & Moeliker 1990, Mason 2005, Wilkinson 2006) to suggest a correlation between the density of House Sparrows and the proportion of 'green land' in the area, or with the distance of the area from the edge of the town. This is not surprising as the percentage of green land does not take into account the quality of that area in providing su$cient invertebrates to rear the chicks satisfactorily (ranging from soft-bodied insects such as aphids for the first few days to larger invertebrates such as beetles and spiders towards the end of the nestling period), seeds and household scraps throughout the year for the fledglings and adults, together with cover where the birds can take refuge against enemies (Wilkinson 2006).…”
Section: Densities Of House Sparrows In Di#erent Urban Habitats In a mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This is not surprising as the percentage of green land does not take into account the quality of that area in providing su$cient invertebrates to rear the chicks satisfactorily (ranging from soft-bodied insects such as aphids for the first few days to larger invertebrates such as beetles and spiders towards the end of the nestling period), seeds and household scraps throughout the year for the fledglings and adults, together with cover where the birds can take refuge against enemies (Wilkinson 2006). Furthermore, some exposed soil is necessary not only for foraging, but also for dustbathing.…”
Section: Densities Of House Sparrows In Di#erent Urban Habitats In a mentioning
confidence: 99%